Judges / Northern District of Illinois

Rebecca R. Pallmeyer

Written decisions in the mandamus and agency-delay group that Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer signed, every one listed below, and the agency-delay suits that name the judge.

2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

Read these counts as a record of past decisions, not a rate at which this judge rules for either side and not a prediction. Each decision turned on its own facts, its posture and what the parties asked for; the suits that reach a written decision are the contested minority. Read the decisions before drawing anything from them.

How the decisions came out

This page counts 6 of the group's written decisions, from 6 cases; the newest of them was decided March 17, 2026. The line at the top counts the whole group.

6written decisions
6cases they come from
0decisions weigh the TRAC factors
–median months from the application to the suit

Each case counts once in these outcome counts, by its latest decision here. A motion to dismiss denied and a later judgment for the government count as the judgment. How decisions are grouped into cases.

Disposition, by case

  • Dismissed4
  • Remanded to the agency2

Prevailing party, by case

  • Applicant2
  • Government4

Months from the application to the suit

Fewer than five cases state it (3); no distribution is shown.

1 of these is a section 1447(b) naturalization suit, whose months run from the application; the statute's 120 days run from the interview, which these figures do not measure.

Months from the application to the court's decision

Fewer than five decisions state it (3); no distribution is shown.

Leaves out the 2 decisions holding that the agency had acted: their months to the decision are not a delay.

What the suits asked for, by case

  • Decide the application2
  • Schedule an interview1
  • Naturalization hearing or remand (1447(b))1
  • Some other action1
  • Not recorded1

Agency, by case

  • USCIS5
  • National Visa Center1

Form or filing, by case

  • I-130 (relative petition)2
  • DS-260 (immigrant visa)1
  • I-485 (adjustment of status)1
  • I-751 (removal of conditions)1
  • I-918 (U visa)1
  • N-400 (naturalization)1

Decisions by year

TRAC rulings

None of the judge's decisions in the group weighs the TRAC factors.

Every decision, by case

All 6 of the judge's decisions in the group, in 6 cases, newest first. Each case's latest decision comes first and is the one the counts above count; the case's other orders follow it. Download every decision as a spreadsheet (CSV).

DecisionDecidedAgencyFormDispositionPrevailing party
Kothari v. Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services March 17, 2026 USCIS I-918 Dismissed Government
Bangert v. U.S. Embassy In Ethiopia, Consular Section July 8, 2025 National Visa Center DS-260 Dismissed Government
Sabo v. Mayorkas June 5, 2024 USCIS I-130, I-751 Dismissed Government
Koleda v. Jaddou April 18, 2024 USCIS I-485 Dismissed Government
BRISTOW v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) March 28, 2024 USCIS I-130 Remanded to the agency Applicant
Popnikolovski v. United States Department of Homeland Security, Citizenship & Immigration Services July 14, 2010 USCIS N-400 Remanded to the agency Applicant

How agency-delay suits ended

Most suits end without a written decision: the agency acts and the parties dismiss. These counts come from the docket record (the federal courts' Integrated Database and CourtListener) and count every mandamus, APA and section 1447(b) suit against any immigration agency, whatever year it was filed, among the dockets that name this judge. Check a delay counts fewer: a court's suits of the last three years against the form's agency.

12suits in the docket record
11have ended
1still pending
184median days from the suit's filing to its end

How the ended suits ended

  • Ended once the agency actedThe plaintiff dismissed, the parties stipulated to dismissal, or the court dismissed as moot: how suits end once the agency decides. The docket rarely says why, or whether the agency approved or denied.6
  • Dismissed on jurisdiction or the meritsDismissed for want of jurisdiction or on the TRAC factors, or judgment for the government.2
  • Ended, outcome not recordedThe record shows the suit ended but not how.2
  • Remanded to the agencySent back to the agency, usually a naturalization case under section 1447(b).1

The record gives no reason for 18% of the suits that ended.

Days from the suit's filing to its end

184 days at the median; half fall between 79 and 351.5. 11 dockets state it.

Days from the suit's filing to its end, when it ended once the agency acted

122 days at the median; half fall between 35.2 and 254.5. 6 dockets state it.

4 of these suits have a written decision in the group.