Judges / Southern District of New York

Katherine Polk Failla

Written decisions in the mandamus and agency-delay group that Judge Katherine Polk Failla signed, every one listed below, and the agency-delay suits that name the judge.

2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

Read these counts as a record of past decisions, not a rate at which this judge rules for either side and not a prediction. Each decision turned on its own facts, its posture and what the parties asked for; the suits that reach a written decision are the contested minority. Read the decisions before drawing anything from them.

How the decisions came out

This page counts 9 of the group's written decisions, from 7 cases; the newest of them was decided August 20, 2025. The line at the top counts the whole group.

9written decisions
7cases they come from
2decisions weigh the TRAC factors
–median months from the application to the suit

Each case counts once in these outcome counts, by its latest decision here: the 2 other orders in those cases are listed with their case, not counted again. A motion to dismiss denied and a later judgment for the government count as the judgment. How decisions are grouped into cases.

Disposition, by case

  • Dismissed4
  • Dismissed in part; some claims go on1
  • Remanded to the agency1
  • Transferred to another court1

Prevailing party, by case

  • Government4
  • Each side in part2
  • Neither side1

Months from the application to the suit

Fewer than five cases state it (3); no distribution is shown.

Months from the application to the court's decision

Fewer than five decisions state it (4); no distribution is shown.

What the suits asked for, by case

  • Decide the application1
  • Decide the asylum application3
  • Some other action1
  • Not recorded2

Agency, by case

  • USCIS5
  • EOIR1
  • Department of State1

Form or filing, by case

  • I-589 (asylum)3
  • 221(g) (consular refusal)1
  • DS-160 (nonimmigrant visa)1
  • I-130 (relative petition)1
  • N-3361
  • N-400 (naturalization)1

Decisions by year

TRAC rulings

Decisions in which the judge weighed the TRAC factors, newest first, with how the judge found each factor. Factors the decision did not reach are left blank.

DecisionDecided1. Rule of reason2. Congressional timetable3. Human health and welfare4. Competing priorities5. Interests prejudiced6. No impropriety neededDisposition
Ujka v. Mayorkas August 20, 2025 favors the governmentfavors the governmentfavors the governmentfavors the governmentfavors the governmentfavors the government Dismissed
Xu v. Cissna January 16, 2020 favors the governmentneutralfavors the governmentfavors the governmentfavors the government Dismissed

Every decision, by case

All 9 of the judge's decisions in the group, in 7 cases, newest first. Each case's latest decision comes first and is the one the counts above count; the case's other orders follow it. Download every decision as a spreadsheet (CSV).

DecisionDecidedAgencyFormDispositionPrevailing party
Ujka v. Mayorkas August 20, 2025 USCIS I-589 Dismissed Government
Jin v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services October 3, 2022 USCIS I-589 Transferred to another court Neither side
Reyes v. McHenry and 1 other order in this case, below August 20, 2021 EOIR Remanded to the agency Each side in part
Other order in this case Reyes v. McHenry August 3, 2020 EOIR Discovery or record order Neither side
Saleh v. Pastore and 1 other order in this case, below April 27, 2021 USCIS N-336, N-400 Dismissed Government
Other order in this case Saleh v. Pastore March 28, 2021 USCIS N-336, N-400 Procedural order Neither side
Qadar v. Dept. of Homeland Security March 24, 2021 Department of State 221(g), DS-160 Dismissed in part; some claims go on Each side in part
Xu v. Cissna January 16, 2020 USCIS I-589 Dismissed Government
Ahmed v. Cissna August 31, 2018 USCIS I-130 Dismissed Government

How agency-delay suits ended

Most suits end without a written decision: the agency acts and the parties dismiss. These counts come from the docket record (the federal courts' Integrated Database and CourtListener) and count every mandamus, APA and section 1447(b) suit against any immigration agency, whatever year it was filed, among the dockets that name this judge. Check a delay counts fewer: a court's suits of the last three years against the form's agency.

24suits in the docket record
22have ended
2still pending
100.5median days from the suit's filing to its end

How the ended suits ended

  • Ended once the agency actedThe plaintiff dismissed, the parties stipulated to dismissal, or the court dismissed as moot: how suits end once the agency decides. The docket rarely says why, or whether the agency approved or denied.14
  • Dismissed, ground not recordedThe court dismissed and the record gives no ground: it can be a dismissal as moot after the agency acted, for want of prosecution, or a loss.5
  • Dismissed on jurisdiction or the meritsDismissed for want of jurisdiction or on the TRAC factors, or judgment for the government.3

Days from the suit's filing to its end

100.5 days at the median; half fall between 67 and 278.5. 22 dockets state it.

Days from the suit's filing to its end, when it ended once the agency acted

100.5 days at the median; half fall between 70.2 and 191.5. 14 dockets state it.

6 of these suits have a written decision in the group.