Passim

Mandamus decisions / Southern District of New York

Jin v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services

Southern District of New YorkKatherine Polk FaillaDecided October 3, 2022No. 1:22-cv-08113

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency USCIS Read by a model
the alleged failure of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) to issue a decision as to Plaintiff’s application for asylum and for withholding of removal.
Form or filing I-589 (asylum) Read by a model
Plaintiff’s application for asylum and for withholding of removal.
What the suit asked for Decide the asylum application Read by a model
to issue a decision as to Plaintiff’s application for asylum and for withholding of removal.
Kind of order A transfer order Read by a model
The Court directs the Clerk of Court to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York.
Motion decided None Read by a model
Whose motion The court on its own Read by a model
Accordingly, because this Court is not a proper venue for this action, in the interest of justice, the Court transfers this action to the only proper venue for this action, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York.
Disposition Transferred to another court An order moving the case to another court. It decides where the suit is heard, not who wins, so it is not counted as either side's win. Read by a model
The Court directs the Clerk of Court to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York.
Prevailing party Neither side Read by a model
The Court directs the Clerk of Court to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York.
The delay claim Not decided here Read by a model
The Court directs the Clerk of Court to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York.
Months pending Not stated Read by a model
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model

How the case ended

Docket
No. 1:22-cv-08113
Filed
September 22, 2022
Ended
October 3, 2022
Suit's filing to its end
11 days
How it ended
Transferred
From the record
idb disp 0 (transferred to another district)

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why.

Supreme Court and Second Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.