Judges / Northern District of California
Thomas S. Hixson
Written decisions in the mandamus and agency-delay group that Judge Thomas S. Hixson signed, every one listed below, and the agency-delay suits that name the judge.
2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.
These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.
Read these counts as a record of past decisions, not a rate at which this judge rules for either side and not a prediction. Each decision turned on its own facts, its posture and what the parties asked for; the suits that reach a written decision are the contested minority. Read the decisions before drawing anything from them.
How the decisions came out
This page counts 6 of the group's written decisions, from 5 cases; the newest of them was decided July 10, 2026. The line at the top counts the whole group.
6written decisions
5cases they come from
2decisions weigh the TRAC factors
15.8median months from the application to the suit
Each case counts once in these outcome counts, by its latest decision here: the 1 other order in those cases is listed with their case, not counted again. A motion to dismiss denied and a later judgment for the government count as the judgment. How decisions are grouped into cases.
Disposition, by case
Months from the application to the suit
15.8 months at the median; half fall between 15.4 and 26.6. 5 cases state it.
Months from the application to the court's decision
23.3 months at the median; half fall between 21 and 30.4. 5 decisions state it.
What the suits asked for, by case
- Decide the application2
- Schedule an interview1
- Finish 221(g) processing1
- Decide the asylum application1
Decisions by year
TRAC rulings
Decisions in which the judge weighed the TRAC factors, newest first, with how the judge found each factor. Factors the decision did not reach are left blank.
| Decision | Decided | 1. Rule of reason | 2. Congressional timetable | 3. Human health and welfare | 4. Competing priorities | 5. Interests prejudiced | 6. No impropriety needed | Disposition |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reyes Briseda v. Bardini | May 8, 2024 | favors the government | favors the government | favors the government | favors the government | favors the government | neutral | Granted in the government's favor |
| POURSOHI v. BLINKEN | November 16, 2021 | favors the government | neutral | favors the applicant | favors the government | favors the applicant | neutral | Granted in the government's favor |
Every decision, by case
All 6 of the judge's decisions in the group, in 5 cases, newest first. Each case's latest decision comes first and is the one the counts above count; the case's other orders follow it. Download every decision as a spreadsheet (CSV).
| Decision | Decided | Agency | Form | Disposition | Prevailing party |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dinh v. Edlow | July 10, 2026 | USCIS | I-131, I-526E, I-765 | Denied in the applicant's favor | Applicant |
| Delgosha v. Noem | June 18, 2026 | USCIS | N-400 | Denied in the applicant's favor | Applicant |
| Fang v. Rubio | September 29, 2025 | Department of State | 221(g), DS-160 | Transferred to another court | Neither side |
| Reyes Briseda v. Bardini | May 8, 2024 | USCIS | I-589 | Granted in the government's favor | Government |
| POURSOHI v. BLINKEN and 1 other order in this case, below | November 16, 2021 | Department of State | DS-260 | Granted in the government's favor | Government |
| Other order in this case POURSOHI v. BLINKEN | July 29, 2021 | Not recorded | DS-260 | Denied in the government's favor | Government |
How agency-delay suits ended
Most suits end without a written decision: the agency acts and the parties dismiss. These counts come from the docket record (the federal courts' Integrated Database and CourtListener) and count every mandamus, APA and section 1447(b) suit against any immigration agency, whatever year it was filed, among the dockets that name this judge. Check a delay counts fewer: a court's suits of the last three years against the form's agency.
65suits in the docket record
57have ended
8still pending
148median days from the suit's filing to its end
How the ended suits ended
- Ended once the agency actedThe plaintiff dismissed, the parties stipulated to dismissal, or the court dismissed as moot: how suits end once the agency decides. The docket rarely says why, or whether the agency approved or denied.48
- Dismissed on jurisdiction or the meritsDismissed for want of jurisdiction or on the TRAC factors, or judgment for the government.3
- Remanded to the agencySent back to the agency, usually a naturalization case under section 1447(b).3
- Dismissed, ground not recordedThe court dismissed and the record gives no ground: it can be a dismissal as moot after the agency acted, for want of prosecution, or a loss.1
- TransferredMoved to another district court.1
- Ended, outcome not recordedThe record shows the suit ended but not how.1
Days from the suit's filing to its end
148 days at the median; half fall between 75 and 270. 57 dockets state it.
Days from the suit's filing to its end, when it ended once the agency acted
147 days at the median; half fall between 74.2 and 275.2. 48 dockets state it.
20 of these suits have a written decision in the group.