Judges / Northern District of California

Susan G. Van Keulen

Written decisions in the mandamus and agency-delay group that Judge Susan G. Van Keulen signed, every one listed below, and the agency-delay suits that name the judge.

2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

Read these counts as a record of past decisions, not a rate at which this judge rules for either side and not a prediction. Each decision turned on its own facts, its posture and what the parties asked for; the suits that reach a written decision are the contested minority. Read the decisions before drawing anything from them.

How the decisions came out

This page counts 12 of the group's written decisions, from 10 cases; the newest of them was decided October 16, 2026. The line at the top counts the whole group.

12written decisions
10cases they come from
2decisions weigh the TRAC factors
9.6median months from the application to the suit

Each case counts once in these outcome counts, by its latest decision here: the 2 other orders in those cases are listed with their case, not counted again. A motion to dismiss denied and a later judgment for the government count as the judgment. How decisions are grouped into cases.

Disposition, by case

  • Granted (either side's motion)1
  • Denied (either side's motion)2
  • Dismissed1
  • Dismissed in part; some claims go on4
  • Dismissed as moot1
  • Other ruling1

Prevailing party, by case

  • Applicant3
  • Government2
  • Each side in part4
  • Neither side1

Months from the application to the suit

9.6 months at the median; half fall between 7.2 and 35.1. 7 cases state it.

Months from the application to the court's decision

16.6 months at the median; half fall between 9.6 and 50.7. 10 decisions state it.

Leaves out the 1 decision holding that the agency had acted: its months to the decision are not a delay.

What the suits asked for, by case

  • Decide the application6
  • Schedule an interview1
  • Issue a work permit2
  • Not recorded1

Agency, by case

  • USCIS8
  • Department of State1
  • Not recorded1

Form or filing, by case

  • I-485 (adjustment of status)7
  • I-765 (EAD)3
  • I-526E (investor petition)2
  • DS-260 (immigrant visa)1

Decisions by year

TRAC rulings

Decisions in which the judge weighed the TRAC factors, newest first, with how the judge found each factor. Factors the decision did not reach are left blank.

DecisionDecided1. Rule of reason2. Congressional timetable3. Human health and welfare4. Competing priorities5. Interests prejudiced6. No impropriety neededDisposition
Dayabaran v. Edlow July 29, 2026 favors the governmentfavors the applicantfavors the governmentfavors the governmentneutral Dismissed
Ahmed v. United States Department of State January 26, 2024 favors the governmentneutralfavors the applicantfavors the governmentfavors the applicantneutral Granted in the government's favor

Every decision, by case

All 12 of the judge's decisions in the group, in 10 cases, newest first. Each case's latest decision comes first and is the one the counts above count; the case's other orders follow it. Download every decision as a spreadsheet (CSV).

DecisionDecidedAgencyFormDispositionPrevailing party
Behdin et al v. Edlow and 1 other order in this case, below October 16, 2026 USCIS I-765 Dismissed as moot Neither side
Other order in this case Behdin v. Edlow April 16, 2026 USCIS I-765 Granted in the applicant's favor Applicant
Dayabaran v. Edlow July 29, 2026 USCIS I-485, I-526E Dismissed Government
Mamaduru v. Edlow July 14, 2026 USCIS I-485, I-526E Dismissed in part; some claims go on Each side in part
Shokri Varniab v. Edlow and 1 other order in this case, below June 12, 2026 USCIS I-485, I-765 Dismissed in part; some claims go on Each side in part
Other order in this case Shokri Varniab v. Edlow February 20, 2026 USCIS I-485, I-765 Granted in the applicant's favor Applicant
Narayan v. Edlow April 16, 2026 USCIS I-485 Denied in the applicant's favor Applicant
Huezo v. Edlow April 15, 2026 USCIS I-485 Dismissed in part; some claims go on Each side in part
Wang v. Edlow April 15, 2026 USCIS I-485 Dismissed in part; some claims go on Each side in part
Gao v. United States Department of Homeland Security April 8, 2026 USCIS I-485 Denied in the applicant's favor Applicant
Ding v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) February 10, 2026 Not recorded I-765 Other ruling Applicant
Ahmed v. United States Department of State January 26, 2024 Department of State DS-260 Granted in the government's favor Government

How agency-delay suits ended

Most suits end without a written decision: the agency acts and the parties dismiss. These counts come from the docket record (the federal courts' Integrated Database and CourtListener) and count every mandamus, APA and section 1447(b) suit against any immigration agency, whatever year it was filed, among the dockets that name this judge. Check a delay counts fewer: a court's suits of the last three years against the form's agency.

84suits in the docket record
70have ended
14still pending
93.5median days from the suit's filing to its end

How the ended suits ended

  • Ended once the agency actedThe plaintiff dismissed, the parties stipulated to dismissal, or the court dismissed as moot: how suits end once the agency decides. The docket rarely says why, or whether the agency approved or denied.62
  • Dismissed on jurisdiction or the meritsDismissed for want of jurisdiction or on the TRAC factors, or judgment for the government.3
  • Remanded to the agencySent back to the agency, usually a naturalization case under section 1447(b).3
  • TransferredMoved to another district court.1
  • Ended, outcome not recordedThe record shows the suit ended but not how.1

Days from the suit's filing to its end

93.5 days at the median; half fall between 61 and 217. 70 dockets state it.

Days from the suit's filing to its end, when it ended once the agency acted

89 days at the median; half fall between 59.5 and 196.8. 62 dockets state it.

19 of these suits have a written decision in the group.