Judges / Southern District of Texas

Lee Hyman Rosenthal

Written decisions in the mandamus and agency-delay group that Judge Lee Hyman Rosenthal signed, every one listed below, and the agency-delay suits that name the judge.

2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

Read these counts as a record of past decisions, not a rate at which this judge rules for either side and not a prediction. Each decision turned on its own facts, its posture and what the parties asked for; the suits that reach a written decision are the contested minority. Read the decisions before drawing anything from them.

How the decisions came out

This page counts 10 of the group's written decisions, from 10 cases; the newest of them was decided April 10, 2026. The line at the top counts the whole group.

10written decisions
10cases they come from
0decisions weigh the TRAC factors
–median months from the application to the suit

Each case counts once in these outcome counts, by its latest decision here. A motion to dismiss denied and a later judgment for the government count as the judgment. How decisions are grouped into cases.

Disposition, by case

  • Granted (either side's motion)2
  • Dismissed2
  • Dismissed in part; some claims go on2
  • Dismissed as moot3
  • Stipulated or agreed order1

Prevailing party, by case

  • Government4
  • Each side in part2
  • Neither side4

Months from the application to the suit

Fewer than five cases state it (2); no distribution is shown.

1 of these is a section 1447(b) naturalization suit, whose months run from the application; the statute's 120 days run from the interview, which these figures do not measure.

Months from the application to the court's decision

28.2 months at the median; half fall between 17.4 and 55.4. 8 decisions state it.

Leaves out the 2 decisions holding that the agency had acted: their months to the decision are not a delay.

What the suits asked for, by case

  • Decide the application5
  • Finish 221(g) processing1
  • Decide the asylum application2
  • Naturalization hearing or remand (1447(b))1
  • Not recorded1

Agency, by case

  • USCIS8
  • Department of State2

Form or filing, by case

  • I-589 (asylum)3
  • N-400 (naturalization)2
  • 221(g) (consular refusal)1
  • DS-160 (nonimmigrant visa)1
  • I-130 (relative petition)1
  • I-140 (immigrant worker petition)1
  • I-290B1
  • I-360 (special immigrant petition)1
  • I-485 (adjustment of status)1
  • I-829 (investor conditions)1

Decisions by year

TRAC rulings

None of the judge's decisions in the group weighs the TRAC factors.

Every decision, by case

All 10 of the judge's decisions in the group, in 10 cases, newest first. Each case's latest decision comes first and is the one the counts above count; the case's other orders follow it. Download every decision as a spreadsheet (CSV).

DecisionDecidedAgencyFormDispositionPrevailing party
Shirdelzadeh v. Rubio April 10, 2026 Department of State Dismissed as moot Neither side
Salgar v. Noem February 2, 2026 USCIS I-360, I-589 Granted in the government's favor Government
Raza v. Jaddou July 23, 2025 USCIS I-290B, I-829 Dismissed as moot Neither side
Khosravi v. United States Department of State April 2, 2025 Department of State 221(g), DS-160 Dismissed as moot Neither side
Duran v. USCIS June 25, 2024 USCIS I-589 Dismissed Government
Ayana v. US Department of Homeland Security December 27, 2023 USCIS I-589 Dismissed Government
Tankoano v. Jaddou January 25, 2023 USCIS N-400 Dismissed in part; some claims go on Each side in part
RABUT v. NIELSEN May 17, 2018 USCIS I-130 Stipulated or agreed order Neither side
Rizvi v. Department of Homeland Security August 4, 2014 USCIS I-140, I-485 Granted in the government's favor Government
Sawan v. Chertoff November 18, 2008 USCIS N-400 Dismissed in part; some claims go on Each side in part

How agency-delay suits ended

Most suits end without a written decision: the agency acts and the parties dismiss. These counts come from the docket record (the federal courts' Integrated Database and CourtListener) and count every mandamus, APA and section 1447(b) suit against any immigration agency, whatever year it was filed, among the dockets that name this judge. Check a delay counts fewer: a court's suits of the last three years against the form's agency.

44suits in the docket record
39have ended
5still pending
106median days from the suit's filing to its end

How the ended suits ended

  • Ended once the agency actedThe plaintiff dismissed, the parties stipulated to dismissal, or the court dismissed as moot: how suits end once the agency decides. The docket rarely says why, or whether the agency approved or denied.29
  • Dismissed, ground not recordedThe court dismissed and the record gives no ground: it can be a dismissal as moot after the agency acted, for want of prosecution, or a loss.6
  • Dismissed on jurisdiction or the meritsDismissed for want of jurisdiction or on the TRAC factors, or judgment for the government.3
  • Ended, outcome not recordedThe record shows the suit ended but not how.1

Days from the suit's filing to its end

106 days at the median; half fall between 46 and 175.5. 39 dockets state it.

Days from the suit's filing to its end, when it ended once the agency acted

93 days at the median; half fall between 44 and 175. 29 dockets state it.

11 of these suits have a written decision in the group.