Judges / Southern District of New York

Paul A. Crotty

Written decisions in the mandamus and agency-delay group that Judge Paul A. Crotty signed, every one listed below, and the agency-delay suits that name the judge.

2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

Read these counts as a record of past decisions, not a rate at which this judge rules for either side and not a prediction. Each decision turned on its own facts, its posture and what the parties asked for; the suits that reach a written decision are the contested minority. Read the decisions before drawing anything from them.

How the decisions came out

This page counts 5 of the group's written decisions, from 5 cases; the newest of them was decided March 15, 2023. The line at the top counts the whole group.

5written decisions
5cases they come from
2decisions weigh the TRAC factors
–median months from the application to the suit

Each case counts once in these outcome counts, by its latest decision here. A motion to dismiss denied and a later judgment for the government count as the judgment. How decisions are grouped into cases.

Disposition, by case

  • Dismissed3
  • Discovery or record order1
  • Not recorded1

Prevailing party, by case

  • Government3
  • Neither side1
  • Not recorded1

Months from the application to the suit

Fewer than five cases state it (2); no distribution is shown.

Months from the application to the court's decision

Fewer than five decisions state it (3); no distribution is shown.

What the suits asked for, by case

  • Decide the application4
  • Some other action1

Agency, by case

  • USCIS2
  • DHS1
  • EOIR1
  • Not recorded1

Form or filing, by case

  • I-485 (adjustment of status)2
  • DS-160 (nonimmigrant visa)1
  • I-526 (investor petition)1

Decisions by year

TRAC rulings

Decisions in which the judge weighed the TRAC factors, newest first, with how the judge found each factor. Factors the decision did not reach are left blank.

DecisionDecided1. Rule of reason2. Congressional timetable3. Human health and welfare4. Competing priorities5. Interests prejudiced6. No impropriety neededDisposition
Echegoyen Cohen v. Renaud March 15, 2023 favors the governmentfavors the applicantfavors the applicantfavors the governmentfavors the applicantneutral Dismissed
Aydemir v. Garland September 6, 2022 favors the governmentfavors the applicantfavors the applicantfavors the governmentfavors the applicantneutral Dismissed

Every decision, by case

All 5 of the judge's decisions in the group, in 5 cases, newest first. Each case's latest decision comes first and is the one the counts above count; the case's other orders follow it. Download every decision as a spreadsheet (CSV).

DecisionDecidedAgencyFormDispositionPrevailing party
Echegoyen Cohen v. Renaud March 15, 2023 USCIS I-526 Dismissed Government
Aydemir v. Garland September 6, 2022 USCIS I-485 Dismissed Government
L.V.M. v. Lloyd June 3, 2019 Not recorded Discovery or record order Neither side
Kilani-Hewitt v. Bukszpan September 8, 2015 EOIR I-485 Dismissed Government
American Academy of Religion v. Chertoff June 23, 2006 DHS DS-160 Not recorded Not recorded

How agency-delay suits ended

Most suits end without a written decision: the agency acts and the parties dismiss. These counts come from the docket record (the federal courts' Integrated Database and CourtListener) and count every mandamus, APA and section 1447(b) suit against any immigration agency, whatever year it was filed, among the dockets that name this judge. Check a delay counts fewer: a court's suits of the last three years against the form's agency.

3 dockets: fewer than 5, so no distribution is shown. List them.