Judges / District of Massachusetts

F. Dennis Saylor IV

Written decisions in the mandamus and agency-delay group that Judge F. Dennis Saylor IV signed, every one listed below, and the agency-delay suits that name the judge.

2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

Read these counts as a record of past decisions, not a rate at which this judge rules for either side and not a prediction. Each decision turned on its own facts, its posture and what the parties asked for; the suits that reach a written decision are the contested minority. Read the decisions before drawing anything from them.

How the decisions came out

This page counts 6 of the group's written decisions, from 6 cases; the newest of them was decided June 11, 2026. The line at the top counts the whole group.

6written decisions
6cases they come from
1decisions weigh the TRAC factors
–median months from the application to the suit

Each case counts once in these outcome counts, by its latest decision here. A motion to dismiss denied and a later judgment for the government count as the judgment. How decisions are grouped into cases.

Disposition, by case

  • Dismissed4
  • Dismissed as moot2

Prevailing party, by case

  • Government4
  • Neither side2

Months from the application to the suit

Fewer than five cases state it (1); no distribution is shown.

1 of these is a section 1447(b) naturalization suit, whose months run from the application; the statute's 120 days run from the interview, which these figures do not measure.

Months from the application to the court's decision

Fewer than five decisions state it (2); no distribution is shown.

Leaves out the 2 decisions holding that the agency had acted: their months to the decision are not a delay.

What the suits asked for, by case

  • Decide the application3
  • Finish 221(g) processing1
  • Naturalization hearing or remand (1447(b))1
  • Not recorded1

Agency, by case

  • USCIS3
  • Department of State2
  • EOIR1

Form or filing, by case

  • DS-260 (immigrant visa)2
  • 221(g) (consular refusal)1
  • I-130 (relative petition)1
  • I-401
  • N-400 (naturalization)1

Decisions by year

TRAC rulings

Decisions in which the judge weighed the TRAC factors, newest first, with how the judge found each factor. Factors the decision did not reach are left blank.

DecisionDecided1. Rule of reason2. Congressional timetable3. Human health and welfare4. Competing priorities5. Interests prejudiced6. No impropriety neededDisposition
Durrani v. Bitter September 18, 2024 favors the governmentfavors the governmentfavors the governmentfavors the governmentfavors the governmentneutral Dismissed

Every decision, by case

All 6 of the judge's decisions in the group, in 6 cases, newest first. Each case's latest decision comes first and is the one the counts above count; the case's other orders follow it. Download every decision as a spreadsheet (CSV).

DecisionDecidedAgencyFormDispositionPrevailing party
Cheema v. Owen June 11, 2026 EOIR Dismissed Government
Durrani v. Bitter September 18, 2024 Department of State DS-260 Dismissed Government
Conley v. United States Department of State April 16, 2024 Department of State 221(g), DS-260 Dismissed Government
Goncalves v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) October 25, 2023 USCIS I-130 Dismissed as moot Neither side
ALI v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY April 24, 2023 USCIS I-40 Dismissed as moot Neither side
Brito Gonzalez v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services March 4, 2022 USCIS N-400 Dismissed Government

How agency-delay suits ended

Most suits end without a written decision: the agency acts and the parties dismiss. These counts come from the docket record (the federal courts' Integrated Database and CourtListener) and count every mandamus, APA and section 1447(b) suit against any immigration agency, whatever year it was filed, among the dockets that name this judge. Check a delay counts fewer: a court's suits of the last three years against the form's agency.

40suits in the docket record
35have ended
5still pending
85median days from the suit's filing to its end

How the ended suits ended

  • Ended once the agency actedThe plaintiff dismissed, the parties stipulated to dismissal, or the court dismissed as moot: how suits end once the agency decides. The docket rarely says why, or whether the agency approved or denied.26
  • Dismissed, ground not recordedThe court dismissed and the record gives no ground: it can be a dismissal as moot after the agency acted, for want of prosecution, or a loss.4
  • Dismissed on jurisdiction or the meritsDismissed for want of jurisdiction or on the TRAC factors, or judgment for the government.2
  • Judgment for the plaintiffA consent, default or other judgment for the plaintiff.1
  • TransferredMoved to another district court.1
  • Ended, outcome not recordedThe record shows the suit ended but not how.1

Days from the suit's filing to its end

85 days at the median; half fall between 44.5 and 169. 35 dockets state it.

Days from the suit's filing to its end, when it ended once the agency acted

65 days at the median; half fall between 39.5 and 140. 26 dockets state it.

10 of these suits have a written decision in the group.