Judges / Northern District of California
Kandis A. Westmore
Written decisions in the mandamus and agency-delay group that Judge Kandis A. Westmore signed, every one listed below, and the agency-delay suits that name the judge.
2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.
These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.
Read these counts as a record of past decisions, not a rate at which this judge rules for either side and not a prediction. Each decision turned on its own facts, its posture and what the parties asked for; the suits that reach a written decision are the contested minority. Read the decisions before drawing anything from them.
How the decisions came out
This page counts 10 of the group's written decisions, from 7 cases; the newest of them was decided October 21, 2026. The line at the top counts the whole group.
10written decisions
7cases they come from
3decisions weigh the TRAC factors
15.6median months from the application to the suit
Each case counts once in these outcome counts, by its latest decision here: the 3 other orders in those cases are listed with their case, not counted again. A motion to dismiss denied and a later judgment for the government count as the judgment. How decisions are grouped into cases.
Disposition, by case
Months from the application to the suit
15.6 months at the median; half fall between 12.8 and 34.9. 5 cases state it.
Months from the application to the court's decision
26.8 months at the median; half fall between 20.2 and 39.2. 6 decisions state it.
Leaves out the 1 decision holding that the agency had acted: its months to the decision are not a delay.
What the suits asked for, by case
- Decide the application4
- Finish 221(g) processing1
- Decide the asylum application1
- Some other action1
Decisions by year
TRAC rulings
Decisions in which the judge weighed the TRAC factors, newest first, with how the judge found each factor. Factors the decision did not reach are left blank.
| Decision | Decided | 1. Rule of reason | 2. Congressional timetable | 3. Human health and welfare | 4. Competing priorities | 5. Interests prejudiced | 6. No impropriety needed | Disposition |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guadarrama v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services | June 5, 2026 | favors the government | neutral | neutral | favors the government | neutral | neutral | Granted in the government's favor |
| Zheng v. Mayorkas | January 11, 2024 | favors the government | neutral | favors the government | favors the government | favors the government | neutral | Granted in the government's favor |
| Najafi v. Pompeo | December 5, 2019 | favors the government | neutral | favors the applicant | favors the government | favors the applicant | favors the government | Denied in the government's favor |
Every decision, by case
All 10 of the judge's decisions in the group, in 7 cases, newest first. Each case's latest decision comes first and is the one the counts above count; the case's other orders follow it. Download every decision as a spreadsheet (CSV).
| Decision | Decided | Agency | Form | Disposition | Prevailing party |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lashkari v. Rubio and 1 other order in this case, below | October 21, 2026 | Department of State | 221(g), DS-260 | Dismissed in part; some claims go on | Each side in part |
| Other order in this case Lashkari v. Rubio | June 5, 2026 | Department of State | 221(g), DS-260 | Denied in the applicant's favor | Applicant |
| Duran v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) et al | October 14, 2026 | USCIS | I-765, I-821D | Stipulated or agreed order | Neither side |
| Kohistani v. Scott | July 29, 2026 | USCIS | I-730 | Granted in the applicant's favor | Applicant |
| Motwani v. Edlow | June 22, 2026 | USCIS | I-485 | Denied in the applicant's favor | Applicant |
| Guadarrama v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services | June 5, 2026 | USCIS | I-130 | Granted in the government's favor | Government |
| Zheng v. Mayorkas | January 11, 2024 | USCIS | I-589 | Granted in the government's favor | Government |
| Najafi v. Pompeo and 2 other orders in this case, below | March 5, 2020 | Department of State | DS-160, DS-260 | Dismissed | Government |
| Other order in this case Najafi v. Pompeo | December 5, 2019 | Department of State | 221(g), DS-160, DS-260 | Denied in the government's favor | Government |
| Other order in this case Najafi v. Pompeo | October 23, 2019 | Department of State | Discovery or record order | Neither side |
How agency-delay suits ended
Most suits end without a written decision: the agency acts and the parties dismiss. These counts come from the docket record (the federal courts' Integrated Database and CourtListener) and count every mandamus, APA and section 1447(b) suit against any immigration agency, whatever year it was filed, among the dockets that name this judge. Check a delay counts fewer: a court's suits of the last three years against the form's agency.
56suits in the docket record
47have ended
9still pending
125median days from the suit's filing to its end
How the ended suits ended
- Ended once the agency actedThe plaintiff dismissed, the parties stipulated to dismissal, or the court dismissed as moot: how suits end once the agency decides. The docket rarely says why, or whether the agency approved or denied.40
- Dismissed on jurisdiction or the meritsDismissed for want of jurisdiction or on the TRAC factors, or judgment for the government.2
- Dismissed, ground not recordedThe court dismissed and the record gives no ground: it can be a dismissal as moot after the agency acted, for want of prosecution, or a loss.2
- Judgment for the plaintiffA consent, default or other judgment for the plaintiff.1
- Remanded to the agencySent back to the agency, usually a naturalization case under section 1447(b).1
- Ended, outcome not recordedThe record shows the suit ended but not how.1
Days from the suit's filing to its end
125 days at the median; half fall between 66 and 293. 47 dockets state it.
Days from the suit's filing to its end, when it ended once the agency acted
105 days at the median; half fall between 61.8 and 278. 40 dockets state it.
10 of these suits have a written decision in the group.