Judges / Northern District of California

Beth Labson Freeman

Written decisions in the mandamus and agency-delay group that Judge Beth Labson Freeman signed, every one listed below, and the agency-delay suits that name the judge.

2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

Read these counts as a record of past decisions, not a rate at which this judge rules for either side and not a prediction. Each decision turned on its own facts, its posture and what the parties asked for; the suits that reach a written decision are the contested minority. Read the decisions before drawing anything from them.

How the decisions came out

This page counts 13 of the group's written decisions, from 9 cases; the newest of them was decided October 30, 2026. The line at the top counts the whole group.

13written decisions
9cases they come from
3decisions weigh the TRAC factors
10.2median months from the application to the suit

Each case counts once in these outcome counts, by its latest decision here: the 4 other orders in those cases are listed with their case, not counted again. A motion to dismiss denied and a later judgment for the government count as the judgment. How decisions are grouped into cases.

Disposition, by case

  • Granted (either side's motion)3
  • Denied (either side's motion)1
  • Dismissed in part; some claims go on2
  • Remanded to the agency1
  • Discovery or record order2

Prevailing party, by case

  • Applicant3
  • Government2
  • Each side in part2
  • Neither side2

Months from the application to the suit

10.2 months at the median; half fall between 5.8 and 19.5. 7 cases state it.

2 of these are section 1447(b) naturalization suits, whose months run from the application; the statute's 120 days run from the interview, which these figures do not measure.

Months from the application to the court's decision

20.4 months at the median; half fall between 14.4 and 28.9. 11 decisions state it.

What the suits asked for, by case

  • Decide the application4
  • Naturalization hearing or remand (1447(b))2
  • Some other action1
  • Not recorded2

Agency, by case

  • USCIS6
  • EOIR1
  • Department of State1
  • Not recorded1

Form or filing, by case

  • I-485 (adjustment of status)3
  • N-400 (naturalization)2
  • DS-260 (immigrant visa)1
  • I-140 (immigrant worker petition)1
  • I-526E (investor petition)1
  • I-5901
  • I-918 (U visa)1

Decisions by year

TRAC rulings

Decisions in which the judge weighed the TRAC factors, newest first, with how the judge found each factor. Factors the decision did not reach are left blank.

DecisionDecided1. Rule of reason2. Congressional timetable3. Human health and welfare4. Competing priorities5. Interests prejudiced6. No impropriety neededDisposition
Chavez Hernandez v. Noem August 11, 2026 favors the applicantfavors the governmentfavors the applicantfavors the governmentfavors the applicantfavors the government Dismissed in part; some claims go on
Vo v. Board of Immigration Appeals March 6, 2026 favors the governmentfavors the governmentfavors the applicantfavors the governmentfavors the applicantfavors the government Denied in the government's favor
Kapoor v. Blinken January 20, 2022 favors the governmentneutralfavors the applicantfavors the governmentfavors the applicantneutral Granted in the government's favor

Every decision, by case

All 13 of the judge's decisions in the group, in 9 cases, newest first. Each case's latest decision comes first and is the one the counts above count; the case's other orders follow it. Download every decision as a spreadsheet (CSV).

DecisionDecidedAgencyFormDispositionPrevailing party
Jamdar v. Edlow and 1 other order in this case, below October 30, 2026 Not recorded I-485 Discovery or record order Neither side
Other order in this case Jamdar v. Edlow June 18, 2026 USCIS I-485 Denied in the applicant's favor Applicant
Chavez Hernandez v. Noem August 11, 2026 USCIS I-918 Dismissed in part; some claims go on Each side in part
Suraj v. Edlow July 29, 2026 USCIS I-485, I-526E Dismissed in part; some claims go on Each side in part
Bakhtiary Davijani v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and 2 other orders in this case, below March 20, 2026 USCIS N-400 Granted in the applicant's favor Applicant
Other order in this case Bakhtiary Davijani v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) March 6, 2026 USCIS N-400 Remanded to the agency Applicant
Other order in this case Bakhtiary Davijani v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) October 17, 2025 USCIS N-400 Remanded to the agency Applicant
Vo v. Board of Immigration Appeals March 6, 2026 EOIR Denied in the government's favor Government
Banukumar v. Mayorkas December 5, 2023 USCIS N-400 Remanded to the agency Applicant
Kapoor v. Blinken and 1 other order in this case, below January 20, 2022 Department of State DS-260 Granted in the government's favor Government
Other order in this case Kapoor v. Blinken July 13, 2021 Not recorded DS-260 Denied in the government's favor Government
Doe 1-4 v. United States Department of Homeland Security August 4, 2021 USCIS I-140, I-485 Discovery or record order Neither side
Jane Doe 1 v. Nielsen July 10, 2018 USCIS I-590 Granted in the applicant's favor Applicant

How agency-delay suits ended

Most suits end without a written decision: the agency acts and the parties dismiss. These counts come from the docket record (the federal courts' Integrated Database and CourtListener) and count every mandamus, APA and section 1447(b) suit against any immigration agency, whatever year it was filed, among the dockets that name this judge. Check a delay counts fewer: a court's suits of the last three years against the form's agency.

28suits in the docket record
24have ended
4still pending
101.5median days from the suit's filing to its end

How the ended suits ended

  • Ended once the agency actedThe plaintiff dismissed, the parties stipulated to dismissal, or the court dismissed as moot: how suits end once the agency decides. The docket rarely says why, or whether the agency approved or denied.19
  • Dismissed on jurisdiction or the meritsDismissed for want of jurisdiction or on the TRAC factors, or judgment for the government.2
  • Dismissed, ground not recordedThe court dismissed and the record gives no ground: it can be a dismissal as moot after the agency acted, for want of prosecution, or a loss.1
  • Judgment for the plaintiffA consent, default or other judgment for the plaintiff.1
  • Remanded to the agencySent back to the agency, usually a naturalization case under section 1447(b).1

Days from the suit's filing to its end

101.5 days at the median; half fall between 58.2 and 192.2. 24 dockets state it.

Days from the suit's filing to its end, when it ended once the agency acted

71 days at the median; half fall between 43 and 114.5. 19 dockets state it.

8 of these suits have a written decision in the group.