Judges / Central District of California
Stanley Blumenfeld Jr.
Written decisions in the mandamus and agency-delay group that Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. signed, every one listed below, and the agency-delay suits that name the judge.
2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.
These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.
Read these counts as a record of past decisions, not a rate at which this judge rules for either side and not a prediction. Each decision turned on its own facts, its posture and what the parties asked for; the suits that reach a written decision are the contested minority. Read the decisions before drawing anything from them.
How the decisions came out
This page counts 6 of the group's written decisions, from 6 cases; the newest of them was decided May 1, 2026. The line at the top counts the whole group.
6written decisions
6cases they come from
1decisions weigh the TRAC factors
–median months from the application to the suit
Each case counts once in these outcome counts, by its latest decision here. A motion to dismiss denied and a later judgment for the government count as the judgment. How decisions are grouped into cases.
Months from the application to the suit
Fewer than five cases state it (0); no distribution is shown.
Months from the application to the court's decision
63 months at the median; half fall between 16.5 and 99.2. 6 decisions state it.
What the suits asked for, by case
- Decide the application2
- Decide the asylum application3
- Issue a work permit1
Agency, by case
- USCIS6
Decisions by year
TRAC rulings
Decisions in which the judge weighed the TRAC factors, newest first, with how the judge found each factor. Factors the decision did not reach are left blank.
| Decision | Decided | 1. Rule of reason | 2. Congressional timetable | 3. Human health and welfare | 4. Competing priorities | 5. Interests prejudiced | 6. No impropriety needed | Disposition |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aye Su Mon v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services USCIS | May 1, 2026 | favors the applicant | favors the applicant | favors the applicant | favors the applicant | favors the applicant | neutral | Granted in the applicant's favor |
Every decision, by case
All 6 of the judge's decisions in the group, in 6 cases, newest first. Each case's latest decision comes first and is the one the counts above count; the case's other orders follow it. Download every decision as a spreadsheet (CSV).
| Decision | Decided | Agency | Form | Disposition | Prevailing party |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aye Su Mon v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services USCIS | May 1, 2026 | USCIS | I-765 | Granted in the applicant's favor | Applicant |
| Debanik Sen v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services | November 12, 2025 | USCIS | I-485, I-526E | Stipulated or agreed order | Neither side |
| Mukesh Reddy Vundra v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services | October 30, 2025 | USCIS | I-485, I-526E | Stipulated or agreed order | Neither side |
| Yun Deng v. U.S. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services | July 25, 2025 | USCIS | I-589 | Stipulated or agreed order | Neither side |
| Xiaofang Chen v. Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services | February 24, 2025 | USCIS | I-589 | Stipulated or agreed order | Neither side |
| Ashot Nikoghosyan v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services | January 6, 2025 | USCIS | I-589 | Stipulated or agreed order | Neither side |
How agency-delay suits ended
Most suits end without a written decision: the agency acts and the parties dismiss. These counts come from the docket record (the federal courts' Integrated Database and CourtListener) and count every mandamus, APA and section 1447(b) suit against any immigration agency, whatever year it was filed, among the dockets that name this judge. Check a delay counts fewer: a court's suits of the last three years against the form's agency.
125suits in the docket record
125have ended
0still pending
74median days from the suit's filing to its end
How the ended suits ended
- Ended once the agency actedThe plaintiff dismissed, the parties stipulated to dismissal, or the court dismissed as moot: how suits end once the agency decides. The docket rarely says why, or whether the agency approved or denied.60
- Dismissed, ground not recordedThe court dismissed and the record gives no ground: it can be a dismissal as moot after the agency acted, for want of prosecution, or a loss.57
- Dismissed on jurisdiction or the meritsDismissed for want of jurisdiction or on the TRAC factors, or judgment for the government.3
- Ended, outcome not recordedThe record shows the suit ended but not how.3
- Judgment for the plaintiffA consent, default or other judgment for the plaintiff.1
- TransferredMoved to another district court.1
Days from the suit's filing to its end
74 days at the median; half fall between 54 and 104. 125 dockets state it.
Days from the suit's filing to its end, when it ended once the agency acted
78.5 days at the median; half fall between 55.8 and 105.2. 60 dockets state it.
8 of these suits have a written decision in the group.