Forms and filings

I-130 (relative petition)

Written decisions in the mandamus and agency-delay group that name this form or filing, in every court.

2,996 written decisions from 2,731 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided November 12, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026 at 1:17 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,617 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,406 (87%), 1,039 of them in this group, measured November 14, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

How the decisions came out

This page counts 162 of the group's written decisions, from 156 cases; the newest of them was decided November 10, 2026. The line at the top counts the whole group.

162written decisions
156cases they come from
17decisions weigh the TRAC factors
28.6median months from the application to the suit

Each case counts once in these outcome counts, by its latest decision here: the 6 other orders in those cases are listed with their case, not counted again. A motion to dismiss denied and a later judgment for the government count as the judgment. How decisions are grouped into cases.

Disposition, by case

  • Granted (either side's motion)12
  • Granted in part4
  • Denied (either side's motion)7
  • Government's motion denied; the case goes on3
  • Dismissed51
  • Dismissed in part; some claims go on10
  • Dismissed as moot25
  • Remanded to the agency2
  • Magistrate judge's recommendation7
  • Transferred to another court16
  • Stipulated or agreed order4
  • Not recorded15

Prevailing party, by case

  • Applicant7
  • Government71
  • Each side in part15
  • Neither side49
  • Not recorded14

Months from the application to the suit

28.6 months at the median; half fall between 15.1 and 42.5. 59 cases state it.

Months from the application to the court's decision, or to the agency's action where it acted first

36 months at the median; half fall between 20.7 and 53.1. 80 decisions state it.

In 31 of these the agency acted before the decision, so the months run to that action, where the delay ended.

Leaves out the 27 decisions holding that the agency had acted where no reading dates that action: their months to the decision are not a delay.

What the suits asked for, by case

  • Decide the application99
  • Schedule an interview2
  • Some other action12
  • Not recorded43

Agency, by case

  • USCIS121
  • Department of State21
  • Not recorded8
  • EOIR4
  • National Visa Center2

Forms and filings these cases name

  • I-130 (relative petition)156
  • I-485 (adjustment of status)39
  • DS-260 (immigrant visa)14
  • 221(g) (consular refusal)11
  • I-765 (EAD)4
  • G-11351
  • I-129F (fiancé(e) petition)1
  • I-131 (travel document)1
  • I-539 (change or extension of stay)1
  • I-751 (removal of conditions)1
  • I-918 (U visa)1

A case that names another form beside this one is counted under both.

Decisions by year

Download these 162 decisions as a spreadsheet (CSV).

Examples

The newest case with each of the most common dispositions, by its latest decision.

Rulings on the government's threshold defenses

How many of the decisions in the group that name this form applied each defense (the defense held) and how many rejected it. A decision counts where it rules on the defense, so most count under none or one. Each count opens those decisions in the list.

DefenseAppliedRejected
Section 1252(a)(2)(B) jurisdiction bar 129
Consular nonreviewability 21
No duty to re-adjudicate a 221(g) refusal 00
Mootness (the agency acted) 447
APA adequate-remedy bar to mandamus 122

This page covers written decisions only: a suit's form is known mostly from its written decision, so counting suits by form would keep mostly the contested ones (how forms are read).