Mandamus decisions / Western District of Missouri
Weizhu Zhu v. Chertoff
Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener
2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.
These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.
What the decision decided
Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.
| Agency |
USCIS
Read by a model
The USCIS is ORDERED to complete its adjudication of Plaintiffs I-485 application within 90 days of the date of this Order. |
|---|---|
| Form or filing |
I-485 (adjustment of status)
Read by a model
In the present case, Zhu filed his I-485 on September 5, 2003. |
| What the suit asked for |
Decide the application
Read by a model
Having no success with these other methods, Zhu filed a petition for a writ of mandamus to instruct the FBI to complete its background check within 30 days and the USCIS to adjudicate his and his family's immigration applications within 60 days of this Court's order. |
| Kind of order |
A ruling on a motion or the petition
Read by a model
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff Weizhu Zhu's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 19] is GRANTED and the above-captioned case REMANDED to USCIS. |
| Motion decided |
Summary judgment
Read by a model
Both sides move for summary judgment [Does. # 19, # 20], which this Court now grants for Plaintiff. |
| Whose motion |
Cross-motions
Read by a model
Both sides move for summary judgment [Does. # 19, # 20], which this Court now grants for Plaintiff. |
| Disposition |
Remanded to the agency
Sent back to the agency, with or without instructions.
Read by a model
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff Weizhu Zhu's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 19] is GRANTED and the above-captioned case REMANDED to USCIS. |
| Prevailing party |
Applicant
Read by a model
The USCIS is ORDERED to complete its adjudication of Plaintiffs I-485 application within 90 days of the date of this Order. |
| The delay claim |
Relief ordered
Read by a model
The USCIS is ORDERED to complete its adjudication of Plaintiffs I-485 application within 90 days of the date of this Order. |
| Months pending |
51.2 months from the application to the court's decision
Read by a model
In the present case, Zhu filed his I-485 on September 5, 2003. |
| TRAC factors | The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model |
| Threshold rulings | None Read by a model |
| Nationality |
China
Read by a model
Plaintiff Weizhu Zhu, a citizen of the People's Republic of China, residing in Columbia, Missouri |
How the case ended
This decision is not linked to a docket in the docket record yet, so how the case ended is not shown.
Supreme Court and Eighth Circuit authority
District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.
-
Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, 542 U.S. 55
Supreme Court, June 14, 2004. Section 706(1) and mandamus reach only a discrete agency action that the agency is legally required to take, so a court cannot compel programmatic improvements or action the law leaves to agency discretion.
ImmCite: treatment available, history exists, not clearance
-
Thigulla v. Jaddou, 94 F.4th 770
Eighth Circuit, March 5, 2024. Section 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii) and § 1255(a) bar review of USCIS's decision to delay adjudicating adjustment applications under its adjudication hold policy, so the district court lacked jurisdiction.
ImmCite: treatment available, history exists, not clearance
-
Eighth Circuit, December 21, 2018. The Eighth Circuit applies the TRAC factors to a petition to compel delayed agency action.
ImmCite: unchecked, treatment not confirmed yet, not evidence either way. ImmCite has not finished reviewing this published circuit decision, so it shows no signal yet. Its review began with circuit decisions in immigration cases and is being extended to the other published circuit decisions that immigration precedent relies on. Read the decisions…