Mandamus decisions / District of Massachusetts

Haidar v. Coomey

District of MassachusettsFrank J. MurrayDecided December 6, 1974

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,996 written decisions from 2,731 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided November 12, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026 at 1:17 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,617 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,406 (87%), 1,039 of them in this group, measured November 14, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency Not recorded Read by a model
Form or filing I-130 (relative petition) Read by a model
Plaintiff seeks an order compelling the adjudication of his wife's pending "immediate relatives" petition before he is deported.
What the suit asked for Decide the application Read by a model
Plaintiff seeks an order compelling the adjudication of his wife's pending "immediate relatives" petition before he is deported.
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
For the reasons noted, plaintiff's motion for mandamus to compel adjudication of his wife's "immediate relatives" petition is denied, and his request for injunctive relief to prevent his deportation is granted in accordance with the following order:
Motion decided None Read by a model
Whose motion The plaintiff's motion Read by a model
plaintiff's motion for mandamus to compel adjudication of his wife's "immediate relatives" petition is denied
Disposition Granted in part The principal motion was granted in part and denied in part. Read by a model
For the reasons noted, plaintiff's motion for mandamus to compel adjudication of his wife's "immediate relatives" petition is denied, and his request for injunctive relief to prevent his deportation is granted in accordance with the following order:
Prevailing party Each side in part Read by a model
For the reasons noted, plaintiff's motion for mandamus to compel adjudication of his wife's "immediate relatives" petition is denied, and his request for injunctive relief to prevent his deportation is granted in accordance with the following order:
The delay claim Relief denied Read by a model
plaintiff's motion for mandamus to compel adjudication of his wife's "immediate relatives" petition is denied
The other claims Relief ordered Read by a model
his request for injunctive relief to prevent his deportation is granted
Months pending Not stated Read by a model
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
The government's delay arguments First-in, first-out processing accepted; Line-jumping accepted Read by a model
All the Immigration and Naturalization Service has done is to require plaintiff to await his turn. Mandamus is not proper on these facts.
Threshold rulings None Read by a model
I-130 category Immediate relative Read by a model
The declaration of "immediate relatives" status of an alien, i. e., that he is an immediate relative of a United States citizen

How the case ended

This decision is not linked to a docket in the docket record yet, so how the case ended is not shown.

Supreme Court and First Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 14, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.