Passim

Mandamus decisions / District of Columbia

Gorrepati v. Wolf

District of ColumbiaColleen Kollar-KotellyDecided February 25, 2021No. 1:21-cv-00062

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency USCIS Read by a model
On January 8, 2021, Plaintiffs filed this civil action seeking “to compel Defendant USCIS to adjudicate [Ms. Gorrepati’s] Form I-765 EAD application and send her Form I-766 EAD card to her as soon as possible, so that she can continue working for her employer.”
Form or filing I-765 (EAD) Read by a model
Ms. Gorrepati submitted a Form I-765 Application for Employment Authorization
What the suit asked for Issue a work permit Read by a model
to compel Defendant USCIS to adjudicate [Ms. Gorrepati’s] Form I-765 EAD application and send her Form I-766 EAD card to her as soon as possible
Kind of order A transfer order Read by a model
will GRANT Defendants’ motion to transfer this case to the Eastern District of Wisconsin, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404 (a)
Motion decided Transfer Read by a model
the Court will GRANT Defendants’ [6] Consent Motion to Transfer and Extend.
Whose motion The government's motion Read by a model
the Court will GRANT Defendants’ [6] Consent Motion to Transfer and Extend.
Disposition Transferred to another court An order moving the case to another court. It decides where the suit is heard, not who wins, so it is not counted as either side's win. Read by a model
will GRANT Defendants’ motion to transfer this case to the Eastern District of Wisconsin, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404 (a)
Prevailing party Neither side Read by a model
will GRANT Defendants’ motion to transfer this case to the Eastern District of Wisconsin, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404 (a)
The delay claim Not decided here Read by a model
the Court will GRANT Defendants’ [6] Consent Motion to Transfer and Extend.
Months pending 5.6 months from the application to the suit; 7.2 months from the application to the court's decision Read by a model
Ms. Gorrepati submitted a Form I-765 Application for Employment Authorization to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) on July 21, 2020
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model

How the case ended

Docket
No. 1:21-cv-00062
Filed
January 8, 2021
Ended
February 25, 2021
Suit's filing to its end
48 days
How it ended
Transferred
From the record
idb disp 0 (transferred to another district)

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.

Supreme Court and D.C. Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.