Passim

Mandamus decisions / District of Massachusetts

Rosales v. Hyde

District of MassachusettsMyong J. JounDecided July 20, 2026No. 1:26-cv-13193

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,996 written decisions from 2,731 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided November 12, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026 at 1:17 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,617 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,406 (87%), 1,039 of them in this group, measured November 14, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency ICE Read by a model
For ten days – since the date of her arrest – Petitioner has been detained by ICE at the ICE Burlington Facility, a facility which ICE itself admits is not equipped to serve as housing.
Form or filing None named Read by a model
What the suit asked for Not recorded Read by a model
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
The Petition at [Doc. No. 1] is therefore GRANTED in part.
Motion decided None Read by a model
Whose motion The plaintiff's motion Read by a model
After Petitioner’s warrantless arrest at Logan International Airport, Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under § 2241.
Disposition Granted in part The principal motion was granted in part and denied in part. Read by a model
The Petition at [Doc. No. 1] is therefore GRANTED in part.
Prevailing party Each side in part Read by a model
The Petition at [Doc. No. 1] is therefore GRANTED in part.
The other claims Relief ordered Read by a model
Respondents are ORDERED to release Petitioner IMMEDIATELY, by no later than 7pm today.
Months pending Not stated Read by a model
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model

How the case ended

Docket
No. 1:26-cv-13193
Filed
July 11, 2026
Status
Pending as of the last docket check

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why.

Supreme Court and First Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 14, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.