Passim

Mandamus decisions / Southern District of New York

Tuba Pulla v. Genalo

Southern District of New YorkMary Kay VyskocilDecided April 1, 2026No. 1:26-cv-02682

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,996 written decisions from 2,731 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided November 12, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026 at 1:17 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,617 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,406 (87%), 1,039 of them in this group, measured November 14, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency ICE Read by a model
See [ECF No. 1] at 24, 25 ¶ 13 (declaring “under penalty of perjury pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746” that “ICE has now placed me on an ankle monitor”); 18 U.S.C. §§ 1621, 1623(a).
Form or filing None named Read by a model
What the suit asked for Not recorded Read by a model
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
Accordingly, the Petition and TRO Application are denied without prejudice to re-filing after amendment.
Motion decided Preliminary injunction or TRO Read by a model
In connection with the Petition, Petitioners have also filed an emergency motion for a temporary restraining order and order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue.
Whose motion The plaintiff's motion Read by a model
Petitioners have also filed an emergency motion for a temporary restraining order and order to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue.
Disposition Denied in the government's favor The principal motion was denied in full: relief the plaintiff asked for denied on the merits, such as summary judgment, an injunction or fees. The government's motion denied so the case goes on is listed apart. Read by a model
Accordingly, the Petition and TRO Application are denied without prejudice to re-filing after amendment.
Prevailing party Government Read by a model
Accordingly, the Petition and TRO Application are denied without prejudice to re-filing after amendment.
The other claims Relief denied Read by a model
Accordingly, the Petition and TRO Application are denied without prejudice to re-filing after amendment.
Months pending Not stated Read by a model
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model

How the case ended

Docket
No. 1:26-cv-02682
Filed
April 1, 2026
Ended
April 6, 2026
Suit's filing to its end
5 days
How it ended
Dismissed, ground not recorded
From the record
idb disp 14 (dismissed: other)

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why.

Supreme Court and Second Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 14, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.