Mandamus decisions / Southern District of New York
Cowboy World Corp. v. Garland
Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener
2,996 written decisions from 2,731 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided November 12, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026 at 1:17 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,617 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,406 (87%), 1,039 of them in this group, measured November 14, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.
These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.
What the decision decided
Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.
| Agency |
USCIS
Read by rule
of the United States, and Joseph Edlow, the Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) (collectively, “Respondents”)1 seeking to compel Respondents to accept |
|---|---|
| Form or filing |
I-140 (immigrant worker petition)
Read by rule
Immigrant Petition for Alien Workers (“I-140”). Pending before the Court is Respondents’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). For the |
| Motion decided |
Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim
Read by rule
Pending before the Court is Respondents’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Fed. R. |
How the case ended
- Docket
- No. 1:24-cv-09929
- On the docket
- This ruling (ECF 31)
- Filed
- December 24, 2024
- Ended
- November 26, 2025
- Suit's filing to its end
- 337 days
- How it ended
- Dismissed on jurisdiction or the merits
- From the record
- idb disp 6 (judgment: motion before trial), judgment for defendant
A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.
The ruling's entry is the docket's one order or judgment entered the day of the decision. Both come from CourtListener's copy of the docket; check them there.
Supreme Court and Second Circuit authority
District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 14, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.
-
Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, 542 U.S. 55
Supreme Court, June 14, 2004. Section 706(1) and mandamus reach only a discrete agency action that the agency is legally required to take, so a court cannot compel programmatic improvements or action the law leaves to agency discretion.
ImmCite: treatment available, history exists, not clearance