Mandamus decisions / Eastern District of Virginia
Qu v. Edlow
Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener
2,996 written decisions from 2,731 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided November 12, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026 at 1:17 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,617 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,406 (87%), 1,039 of them in this group, measured November 14, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.
These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.
What the decision decided
Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.
| Agency |
USCIS
Read by a model
On January 23, 2026, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) denied Petitioner’s 1-485 application. |
|---|---|
| Form or filing |
I-485 (adjustment of status)
Read by a model
On June 9, 2023, Petitioner “filed a Fonn 1-485, Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status |
| What the suit asked for |
Decide the application
Read by a model
On November 13, 2025, Petition filed the present petition for a writ of mandamus to compel Respondents to adjudicate his 1-485 Application. |
| Kind of order |
A ruling on a motion or the petition
Read by a model
The Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 8) will be GRANTED. |
| Motion decided |
Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction
Read by a model
In a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) challenging the Court’s subject matter jurisdiction, the burden rests with the petitioner, as the party asserting jurisdiction, to prove that federal jurisdiction is proper. |
| Whose motion |
The government's motion
Read by a model
Respondents have moved to dismiss the action as moot, since they have completed adjudication of Petitioner’s application for adjusted status. |
| Disposition |
Dismissed as moot
Dismissed or denied as moot because the agency acted.
Read by a model
Here, Petitioner’s claims have been mooted by USCIS’s denial of his 1-485 Petition. |
| Prevailing party |
Neither side
Read by a model
Here, Petitioner’s claims have been mooted by USCIS’s denial of his 1-485 Petition. |
| The delay claim |
Moot: the agency acted
Read by a model
Here, Petitioner’s claims have been mooted by USCIS’s denial of his 1-485 Petition. |
| Months pending |
29.2 months from the application to the suit; 31.5 months from the application to the agency's action
Read by a model
On January 23, 2026, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) denied Petitioner’s 1-485 application. |
| TRAC factors | The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model |
| Threshold rulings |
Held moot
Read by a model
Here, Petitioner’s claims have been mooted by USCIS’s denial of his 1-485 Petition. The Court therefore lacks subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate his petition, requiring dismissal. |
How the case ended
- Docket
- No. 3:25-cv-00925
- Filed
- November 13, 2025
- Ended
- May 4, 2026
- Suit's filing to its end
- 172 days
- How it ended
- Ended once the agency acted
- From the record
- idb disp 14 (dismissed: other)
A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why.
Supreme Court and Fourth Circuit authority
District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 14, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.
-
Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, 542 U.S. 55
Supreme Court, June 14, 2004. Section 706(1) and mandamus reach only a discrete agency action that the agency is legally required to take, so a court cannot compel programmatic improvements or action the law leaves to agency discretion.
ImmCite: treatment available, history exists, not clearance
-
Gonzalez v. Cuccinelli, 985 F.3d 357
Fourth Circuit, January 14, 2021. Courts may review delay in placing U-visa petitioners on the waitlist under the TRAC factors and should not dismiss such claims at the pleading stage, but lack jurisdiction over delay in pre-waitlist work-permit requests, a point on which the Sixth Circuit disagrees.
ImmCite: caution, adverse or limiting treatment found. Rejected in the Sixth Circuit by Barrios Garcia v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 25 F.4th 430 (2022).
-
Lovo v. Miller, 107 F.4th 199
Fourth Circuit, July 3, 2024. The 'decision or action' language of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), which the court treated as coextensive with § 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii), does not reach USCIS inaction, so a district court may hear a claim that USCIS unreasonably delayed a provisional unlawful-presence waiver.
ImmCite: treatment available, history exists, not clearance. ImmCite has read all 5 published decisions citing this case, as of 2026-11-07; none treats it adversely. That describes those decisions; it is not a determination that the case is good law.