Passim

Mandamus decisions / Southern District of New York

Huli v. Way

Southern District of New YorkVictor MarreroDecided October 13, 2005

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency USCIS Read by a model
By letter dated May 23, 2000, BCIS denied Huli's I-730 Petition.
Form or filing I-730 (refugee or asylee relative petition) Read by a model
In October 1999, Huli filed a Refugee Asylee Relative Petition ("I-730 Petition") with the INS
What the suit asked for Not recorded Read by a model
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
Accordingly, for the reasons discussed below, Respondent's motion is granted and Huli's Petition is dismissed.
Motion decided Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Read by a model
cross-moves to dismiss the Petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, or in the alternative, for a grant of summary judgment.
Whose motion Cross-motions Read by a model
the petition of petitioner Rozeta Goxhabelli Huli for a writ of mandamus is DENIED, and the cross-motion (Docket No. 13) of respondent Terry E. Way to dismiss the petition herein is GRANTED.
Disposition Dismissed The case or every delay claim was dismissed for a reason other than mootness. Read by a model
Accordingly, for the reasons discussed below, Respondent's motion is granted and Huli's Petition is dismissed.
Prevailing party Government Read by a model
Accordingly, for the reasons discussed below, Respondent's motion is granted and Huli's Petition is dismissed.
The other claims Dismissed Read by a model
this Court issued an Order granting Respondent's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction
Months pending 7.3 months from the application to the agency's action Read by a model
By letter dated May 23, 2000, BCIS denied Huli's I-730 Petition.
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model

How the case ended

This decision is not linked to a docket in the docket record yet, so how the case ended is not shown.

Supreme Court and Second Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.