Passim

Mandamus decisions / District of Nebraska

Alzuraiki v. Heinauer

District of NebraskaRichard George KopfDecided February 13, 2008

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency USCIS Read by a model
The next action for USCIS to take regarding Plaintiffs naturalization application is to hold the interview.
Form or filing N-400 (naturalization) Read by a model
to adjudicate his N-400 application for naturalization.
What the suit asked for Decide the application Read by a model
compel the defendants to immediately take all actions necessary to adjudicate the application within sixty days of the court's order
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
The motion in filing 5 is granted, because this court lacks jurisdiction or alternatively because the complaint fails to state a claim
Motion decided Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction; Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim Read by a model
This action is before me upon a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, or, alternatively, for failure to state a claim.
Whose motion The government's motion Read by a model
This action is before me upon a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, or, alternatively, for failure to state a claim.
Disposition Dismissed The case or every delay claim was dismissed for a reason other than mootness. Read by a model
The motion in filing 5 is granted, because this court lacks jurisdiction or alternatively because the complaint fails to state a claim;
Prevailing party Government Read by a model
The motion in filing 5 is granted, because this court lacks jurisdiction or alternatively because the complaint fails to state a claim;
The delay claim Dismissed Read by a model
The motion in filing 5 is granted, because this court lacks jurisdiction or alternatively because the complaint fails to state a claim
Months pending 19.4 months from the application to the court's decision Read by a model
the name check request was electronically submitted to the FBI in July, 2006, less than two weeks after Plaintiff filed his N-400 application
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model

How the case ended

This decision is not linked to a docket in the docket record yet, so how the case ended is not shown.

Supreme Court and Eighth Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.