Mandamus decisions / District of Maryland

Bernardes v. Miller

District of MarylandTheodore D. ChuangDecided January 29, 2024No. 8:23-cv-02273

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,996 written decisions from 2,731 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided November 12, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026 at 1:17 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,617 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,406 (87%), 1,039 of them in this group, measured November 14, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency USCIS Read by a model
To date, his Form I-601A has not yet been adjudicated by USCIS.
Form or filing I-601A (provisional waiver) Read by a model
To date, his Form I-601A has not yet been adjudicated by USCIS.
What the suit asked for Decide the application Read by a model
to require USCIS to adjudicate his waiver application within 30 days
Kind of order A procedural order Read by a model
The Court will therefore grant the Motion to Stay this case pending the resolution of Lovo.
Motion decided None Read by a model
Whose motion The government's motion Read by a model
Defendants have filed a Motion to Stay, which is fully briefed.
Disposition Procedural order A scheduling, briefing, stay, show-cause or other procedural order. Not counted as either side's win. Read by a model
The Court will therefore grant the Motion to Stay this case pending the resolution of Lovo.
Prevailing party Neither side Read by a model
The Court will therefore grant the Motion to Stay this case pending the resolution of Lovo.
The delay claim Not decided here Read by a model
The Court will therefore grant the Motion to Stay this case pending the resolution of Lovo.
Months pending 17.1 months from the application to the suit; 22.5 months from the application to the court's decision Read by a model
On March 15, 2022, Bernardes filed with USCIS an application for a provisional waiver of unlawful presence
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model

How the case ended

Docket
No. 8:23-cv-02273
On the docket
This ruling (ECF 24)
Filed
August 19, 2023
Ended
July 3, 2024
Suit's filing to its end
319 days
How it ended
Ended once the agency acted
From the record
idb disp 12 (dismissed: voluntarily)

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.

The ruling's entry is the docket's one order or judgment entered the day of the decision. Both come from CourtListener's copy of the docket; check them there.

Supreme Court and Fourth Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 14, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.