Mandamus decisions / Southern District of New York
Manolakakis v. Mayorkas
Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener
2,996 written decisions from 2,731 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided November 12, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026 at 1:17 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,617 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,406 (87%), 1,039 of them in this group, measured November 14, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.
These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.
What the decision decided
Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.
| Agency |
USCIS
Read by a model
He responded to the reopening on September 13, but on January 6, 2020, USCIS denied his application for naturalization and issued a Notice to Appear in removal proceedings, which are currently pending. |
|---|---|
| Form or filing |
N-336
Read by a model
Form N-336 Request for a Hearing on a Decision in Naturalization Proceedings |
| What the suit asked for |
Some other action
Read by a model
order the Defendants to schedule a hearing on his N-336 |
| Kind of order |
A ruling on a motion or the petition
Read by a model
For the following reasons, the motion to dismiss is granted. |
| Motion decided |
Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction; Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim
Read by a model
Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint on September 15 under Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), Fed. R. Civ. P. |
| Whose motion |
The government's motion
Read by a model
The Defendants moved to dismiss this action on September 15, 2022. |
| Disposition |
Dismissed
The case or every delay claim was dismissed for a reason other than mootness.
Read by a model
Defendants’ September 15 motion is granted. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment for the Defendants and close the case. |
| Prevailing party |
Government
Read by a model
The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment for the Defendants and close the case. |
| The delay claim |
Dismissed
Read by a model
Manolakakis’s claims regarding his N-336 must also be dismissed for failure to state a claim. |
| The other claims |
Dismissed
Read by a model
Defendants’ September 15 motion is granted. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment for the Defendants and close the case. |
| Months pending |
14 months from the application to the suit; 18.7 months from the application to the court's decision
Read by a model
Counsel filed the request again on April 7, 2021, and has yet to receive a response. |
| TRAC factors | The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model |
| Threshold rulings | None Read by a model |
How the case ended
- Docket
- No. 1:22-cv-04620
- On the docket
- This ruling (ECF 11)
- Filed
- June 3, 2022
- Ended
- October 28, 2022
- Suit's filing to its end
- 147 days
- How it ended
- Dismissed on jurisdiction or the merits
- From the record
- idb disp 6 (judgment: motion before trial), judgment for defendant
A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.
The ruling's entry is the docket's one order or judgment entered the day of the decision. Both come from CourtListener's copy of the docket; check them there.
Supreme Court and Second Circuit authority
District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 14, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.
-
Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, 542 U.S. 55
Supreme Court, June 14, 2004. Section 706(1) and mandamus reach only a discrete agency action that the agency is legally required to take, so a court cannot compel programmatic improvements or action the law leaves to agency discretion.
ImmCite: treatment available, history exists, not clearance