Passim

Mandamus decisions / Northern District of Ohio

Tran v. Director of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

Northern District of OhioJohn R. AdamsDecided September 8, 2022No. 5:22-cv-00104

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,996 written decisions from 2,731 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided November 12, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026 at 1:17 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,617 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,406 (87%), 1,039 of them in this group, measured November 14, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency USCIS Read by a model
This Circuit has issued varying views on whether the statutory framework allows for this Court to review the timing aspect of the USCIS process with respect to the adjustment of status.
Form or filing I-485 (adjustment of status) Read by a model
Specifically, Tran seeks an order from this Court finding that there has been an unreasonable delay in adjudicating his application for adjustment of status.
What the suit asked for Decide the application Read by a model
Specifically, Tran seeks an order from this Court finding that there has been an unreasonable delay in adjudicating his application for adjustment of status.
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
Upon review, the motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is GRANTED.
Motion decided Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Read by a model
Upon review, the motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is GRANTED.
Whose motion The government's motion Read by a model
Pending before the Court is a motion to dismiss filed by the Defendant Ur Mendoza Jaddou, the Director of the United States Citizenship and Immigrations Services (“USCIS”).
Disposition Dismissed The case or every delay claim was dismissed for a reason other than mootness. Read by a model
The motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and this matter is hereby DISMISSED.
Prevailing party Government Read by a model
The motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and this matter is hereby DISMISSED.
The delay claim Dismissed Read by a model
The motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and this matter is hereby DISMISSED.
Months pending Not stated Read by a model
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model

How the case ended

Docket
No. 5:22-cv-00104
Filed
January 18, 2022
Ended
September 8, 2022
Suit's filing to its end
233 days
How it ended
Dismissed on jurisdiction or the merits
From the record
order 2022-09-08 dismisses for want of jurisdiction; idb disp 6 (judgment: motion before trial), judgment for defendant

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.

Supreme Court and Sixth Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 14, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.