Mandamus decisions / Eastern District of New York
Weir v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Service
Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener
2,917 written decisions from 2,664 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 7:07 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.
These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.
What the decision decided
Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.
| Agency |
USCIS
Read by a model
Weir commenced this action on April 16, 2019, requesting that the Court compel USCIS, through Bolivar, to issue a determination on his N-336. |
|---|---|
| Form or filing |
N-336; N-400 (naturalization)
Read by a model
On April 17, 2019, USCIS issued a notice of decision on the Form N-336, reaffirming the denial of Weir’s N-400. |
| What the suit asked for |
Some other action
Read by a model
Weir commenced this action on April 16, 2019, requesting that the Court compel USCIS, through Bolivar, to issue a determination on his N-336. |
| Kind of order |
A ruling on a motion or the petition
Read by a model
For the reasons set forth above, defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted. |
| Motion decided |
Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction; Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim; Other motion to dismiss
Read by a model
Defendants now move to dismiss the complaint under Rules 12(b)(1), 12(b)(5), and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. |
| Whose motion |
The government's motion
Read by a model
Defendants now move to dismiss the complaint under Rules 12(b)(1), 12(b)(5), and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. |
| Disposition |
Dismissed
The case or every delay claim was dismissed for a reason other than mootness.
Read by a model
Because Weir’s claims against USCIS and Bolivar are moot, they are dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. |
| Prevailing party |
Government
Read by a model
Because Weir’s claims against USCIS and Bolivar are moot, they are dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. |
| The delay claim |
Moot: the agency acted
Read by a model
Because Weir’s claims against USCIS and Bolivar are moot, they are dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. |
| The other claims |
Dismissed
Read by a model
For the reasons set forth above, defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted. Weir is granted leave to amend his complaint within 30 days from the entry of this Memorandum and Order. |
| Months pending |
14.3 months from the application to the suit; 14.3 months from the application to the agency's action
Read by a model
On April 17, 2019, USCIS issued a notice of decision on the Form N-336, reaffirming the denial of Weir’s N-400. |
| Months since the naturalization interview |
18.6 months from the interview (2017-09-28)
Read by a model
on September 28, 2017, Weir appeared for an interview to determine his eligibility for naturalization. |
| TRAC factors | The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model |
| Threshold rulings |
Held moot
Read by a model
Therefore, Weir’s claims against USCIS and Bolivar became moot when USCIS performed the action Weir sought to compel them to perform. |
Other orders in this case
The group holds 2 decisions from this suit, oldest first. Outcome counts on these pages count the case once, by its latest decision. How decisions are grouped into cases.
| Decision | Decided | Judge | Disposition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Weir v. United States Citizenship and Immigration ServiceThis decision | September 28, 2020 | Roslynn R. Mauskopf | Dismissed |
| Weir v. United States Citizenship and Immigration ServiceThe case's latest decision: its outcome is the one counted | September 22, 2021 | Eric Komitee | Dismissed |
How the case ended
- Docket
- No. 2:19-cv-02223
- Filed
- April 16, 2019
- Ended
- August 15, 2023
- Suit's filing to its end
- 1,582 days
- How it ended
- Ended once the agency acted
- From the record
- idb disp 17 (judgment: other), judgment for defendant
A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.
Supreme Court and Second Circuit authority
District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.
-
Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, 542 U.S. 55
Supreme Court, June 14, 2004. Section 706(1) and mandamus reach only a discrete agency action that the agency is legally required to take, so a court cannot compel programmatic improvements or action the law leaves to agency discretion.
ImmCite: treatment available, history exists, not clearance
-
Ajlani v. Chertoff, 545 F.3d 229
Second Circuit, October 7, 2008. A district court may not grant naturalization under § 1447(b) while removal proceedings are pending against the applicant, because § 1429 gives removal priority.
ImmCite: caution, adverse or limiting treatment found. Rejected in the Third Circuit by Gonzalez v. Secretary of Department of HomeLand Security, 678 F.3d 254 (2012).
-
Bustamante v. Napolitano, 582 F.3d 403
Second Circuit, September 28, 2009. Once an applicant files under § 1447(b), the district court has exclusive jurisdiction over the naturalization application until it decides the matter or remands, and USCIS may not act on it meanwhile.
ImmCite: treatment available, history exists, not clearance