Mandamus decisions / Western District of New York
Sylvain v. Garland
Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener
2,996 written decisions from 2,731 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided November 12, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026 at 1:17 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,617 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,406 (87%), 1,039 of them in this group, measured November 14, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.
These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.
What the decision decided
Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.
| Agency |
EOIR
Read by a model
Sylvain then filed in this Court seeking to compel the BIA to adjudicate his motion to reopen, and to stay his removal pending such adjudication. |
|---|---|
| Form or filing | None named Read by a model |
| What the suit asked for |
Some other action
Read by a model
Sylvain then filed in this Court seeking to compel the BIA to adjudicate his motion to reopen, and to stay his removal pending such adjudication. |
| Kind of order |
A ruling on a motion or the petition
Read by a model
Defendants’ Amended Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiffs case is dismissed with prejudice. |
| Motion decided |
Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction
Read by a model
announced its decision to grant Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, with a written decision to follow. |
| Whose motion |
The government's motion
Read by a model
Defendants’ Amended Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. |
| Disposition |
Dismissed
The case or every delay claim was dismissed for a reason other than mootness.
Read by a model
For the reasons stated above, Defendants’ Amended Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiffs case is dismissed with prejudice. |
| Prevailing party |
Government
Read by a model
For the reasons stated above, Defendants’ Amended Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiffs case is dismissed with prejudice. |
| The delay claim |
Dismissed
Read by a model
Defendants’ Amended Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiffs case is dismissed with prejudice. |
| Months pending |
0.4 months from the application to the court's decision
Read by a model
Sylvain filed a motion to reopen his removal proceedings and a motion to stay his removal with the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) on September 9, 2021. |
| TRAC factors | The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model |
| Threshold rulings | None Read by a model |
| Nationality |
Haiti
Read by a model
Sylvain is a Haitian national |
How the case ended
- Docket
- No. 1:21-cv-01023
- Filed
- September 15, 2021
- Ended
- July 11, 2022
- Suit's filing to its end
- 299 days
- How it ended
- Ended, outcome not recorded
- From the record
- terminated; no disposition recorded
A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.
Supreme Court and Second Circuit authority
District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 14, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.
-
Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, 542 U.S. 55
Supreme Court, June 14, 2004. Section 706(1) and mandamus reach only a discrete agency action that the agency is legally required to take, so a court cannot compel programmatic improvements or action the law leaves to agency discretion.
ImmCite: treatment available, history exists, not clearance