Mandamus decisions / District of Connecticut
Rodney v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener
2,996 written decisions from 2,731 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided November 12, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026 at 1:17 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,617 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,406 (87%), 1,039 of them in this group, measured November 14, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.
These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.
What the decision decided
Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.
| Agency |
ICE
Read by a model
According to the INS, BICE will take custody of Petitioner and immediately deport him upon completion of his state prison sentence. |
|---|---|
| Form or filing | None named Read by a model |
| What the suit asked for |
Some other action
Read by a model
On March 17, 2005, while still in state custody, Petitioner filed the instant Petition for Writ of Mandamus seeking to be deported to Guyana immediately. |
| Kind of order |
A ruling on a motion or the petition
Read by a model
For the reasons set forth herein, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus [Doc. No. 3] is dismissed. |
| Motion decided | None Read by a model |
| Whose motion |
The plaintiff's motion
Read by a model
On March 17, 2005, while still in state custody, Petitioner filed the instant Petition for Writ of Mandamus seeking to be deported to Guyana immediately. |
| Disposition |
Dismissed
The case or every delay claim was dismissed for a reason other than mootness.
Read by a model
For the reasons set forth herein, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus [Doc. No. 3] is dismissed. |
| Prevailing party |
Government
Read by a model
Accordingly, this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over both Petitioner's mandamus claim and his habeas claim. |
| The delay claim |
Dismissed
Read by a model
For the reasons set forth herein, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus [Doc. No. 3] is dismissed. |
| The other claims |
Dismissed
Read by a model
Accordingly, this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over both Petitioner's mandamus claim and his habeas claim. |
| Months pending | Not stated Read by a model |
| TRAC factors | The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model |
| Threshold rulings | None Read by a model |
| Nationality |
Guyana
Read by a model
Petitioner is a citizen and native of Guyana. |
How the case ended
This decision is not linked to a docket in the docket record yet, so how the case ended is not shown.
Supreme Court and Second Circuit authority
District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 14, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.
-
Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, 542 U.S. 55
Supreme Court, June 14, 2004. Section 706(1) and mandamus reach only a discrete agency action that the agency is legally required to take, so a court cannot compel programmatic improvements or action the law leaves to agency discretion.
ImmCite: treatment available, history exists, not clearance