Mandamus decisions / Eastern District of North Carolina
Ibrahim v. Chertoff
Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener
2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.
These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.
What the decision decided
Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.
| Agency |
USCIS
Read by a model
The United States¶ Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services ("CIS") scheduled an interview to be held on 28 September 2005, but it was later cancelled by letter dated 2 September 2005. |
|---|---|
| Form or filing |
N-400 (naturalization)
Read by a model
On 11 August 2004, he filed an N-400 Application for Naturalization ("N-400"). |
| What the suit asked for |
Decide the application
Read by a model
Here, plaintiff's complaint requests relief in the form of an order requiring defendants to adjudicate plaintiffs naturalization application. |
| Kind of order |
A ruling on a motion or the petition
Read by a model
Accordingly, defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and plaintiffs motion *616 for summary judgment is DENIED as MOOT. |
| Motion decided |
Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction; Summary judgment
Read by a model
Accordingly, defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and plaintiffs motion *616 for summary judgment is DENIED as MOOT. |
| Whose motion |
Cross-motions
Read by a model
Accordingly, defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and plaintiffs motion *616 for summary judgment is DENIED as MOOT. |
| Disposition |
Dismissed
The case or every delay claim was dismissed for a reason other than mootness.
Read by a model
This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. |
| Prevailing party |
Government
Read by a model
Accordingly, defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and plaintiffs motion *616 for summary judgment is DENIED as MOOT. |
| The delay claim |
Dismissed
Read by a model
This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. |
| Months pending |
32.2 months from the application to the suit; 40.5 months from the application to the court's decision
Read by a model
On 11 August 2004, he filed an N-400 Application for Naturalization ("N-400"). |
| TRAC factors | The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model |
| Threshold rulings | None Read by a model |
How the case ended
- Docket
- No. 5:07-cv-00141
- Filed
- April 17, 2007
- Ended
- January 2, 2008
- Suit's filing to its end
- 260 days
- How it ended
- Dismissed, ground not recorded
- From the record
- idb disp 14 (dismissed: other)
A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why.
Supreme Court and Fourth Circuit authority
District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.
-
Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, 542 U.S. 55
Supreme Court, June 14, 2004. Section 706(1) and mandamus reach only a discrete agency action that the agency is legally required to take, so a court cannot compel programmatic improvements or action the law leaves to agency discretion.
ImmCite: treatment available, history exists, not clearance
-
Etape v. Chertoff, 497 F.3d 379
Fourth Circuit, August 2, 2007. Filing under § 1447(b) vests exclusive jurisdiction over the naturalization application in the district court, so USCIS may not decide it unless the court remands.
ImmCite: treatment available, history exists, not clearance
-
Dubon v. Jaddou, 109 F.4th 307
Fourth Circuit, July 29, 2024. Whether to decide a § 1447(b) application or remand it to USCIS is within the district court's discretion, and a remand order is not an appealable collateral order.
ImmCite: treatment available, history exists, not clearance. ImmCite has read all 3 published decisions citing this case, as of 2026-10-29; none treats it adversely. That describes those decisions; it is not a determination that the case is good law.
-
Gonzalez v. Cuccinelli, 985 F.3d 357
Fourth Circuit, January 14, 2021. Courts may review delay in placing U-visa petitioners on the waitlist under the TRAC factors and should not dismiss such claims at the pleading stage, but lack jurisdiction over delay in pre-waitlist work-permit requests, a point on which the Sixth Circuit disagrees.
ImmCite: caution, adverse or limiting treatment found. Rejected in the Sixth Circuit by Barrios Garcia v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 25 F.4th 430 (2022).
-
Lovo v. Miller, 107 F.4th 199
Fourth Circuit, July 3, 2024. The 'decision or action' language of § 1182(a)(9)(B)(v), which the court treated as coextensive with § 1252(a)(2)(B)(ii), does not reach USCIS inaction, so a district court may hear a claim that USCIS unreasonably delayed a provisional unlawful-presence waiver.
ImmCite: treatment available, history exists, not clearance. ImmCite has read all 5 published decisions citing this case, as of 2026-10-29; none treats it adversely. That describes those decisions; it is not a determination that the case is good law.