Passim

Mandamus decisions / Southern District of New York

Guo v. Mayorkas

Southern District of New YorkPaul A. EngelmayerDecided November 20, 2024No. 1:24-cv-04716

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency USCIS Read by a model
Defendants submitted exhibits showing USCIS approved Plaintiffs’ Applications on August 28, 2024 and September 20, 2024, respectively.
Form or filing I-485 (adjustment of status) Read by a model
Applications to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status (“Form I-485” or “Applications”)
What the suit asked for Decide the application Read by a model
Plaintiffs seek an order compelling Defendants to adjudicate the Applications.
Kind of order A magistrate judge's recommendation Read by a model
The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Report and Recommendation to Plaintiffs.
Motion decided None Read by a model
Whose motion The court on its own Read by a model
We consider the Cheung rule sua sponte:
Disposition Magistrate judge's recommendation A magistrate judge's report and recommendation. The district judge decides whether to adopt it, so it is not counted as either side's win. Read by a model
The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Report and Recommendation to Plaintiffs.
Prevailing party Neither side Read by a model
The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Report and Recommendation to Plaintiffs.
The delay claim Dismissed Read by a model
we RECOMMEND dismissing the Petition without prejudice.
Months pending Not stated Read by a model
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model

Other orders in this case

The group holds 2 decisions from this suit, oldest first. Outcome counts on these pages count the case once, by its latest decision. How decisions are grouped into cases.

DecisionDecidedJudgeDisposition
Guo v. MayorkasThis decision November 20, 2024 Paul A. Engelmayer Magistrate judge's recommendation
Guo v. MayorkasThe case's latest decision: its outcome is the one counted December 5, 2024 Paul A. Engelmayer Dismissed

How the case ended

Docket
No. 1:24-cv-04716
Filed
June 20, 2024
Ended
December 5, 2024
Suit's filing to its end
168 days
How it ended
Dismissed, ground not recorded
From the record
idb disp 14 (dismissed: other)

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.

Supreme Court and Second Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.