Mandamus decisions / Western District of Washington

Selbi Charyeva3 v. Mayorkas

Western District of WashingtonS. Kate VaughanDecided May 7, 2025No. 2:23-cv-01977

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,996 written decisions from 2,731 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided November 12, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026 at 1:17 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,617 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,406 (87%), 1,039 of them in this group, measured November 14, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency USCIS Read by a model
They claim that “U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (‘USCIS’) has unreasonably delayed the processing of affirmatively filed asylum form I-589 applications in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. § 551 et seq., specifically 5 U.S.C § 706 (1) [and (2)]).”
Form or filing I-589 (asylum) Read by a model
affirmatively filed asylum form I-589 applications
What the suit asked for Decide the asylum application Read by a model
compelling Defendants to adjudicate their asylum applications by a certain date
Kind of order A procedural order Read by a model
Plaintiffs may consolidate and refile supplemental exhibits to their Motion for Summary Judgment, subject to the requirements at Section III of this Order, by May 21, 2025.
Motion decided None Read by a model
Whose motion The plaintiff's motion Read by a model
Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Consolidate at Docket No. 50 is DENIED.
Disposition Procedural order A scheduling, briefing, stay, show-cause or other procedural order. Not counted as either side's win. Read by a model
Plaintiffs may consolidate and refile supplemental exhibits to their Motion for Summary Judgment, subject to the requirements at Section III of this Order, by May 21, 2025.
Prevailing party Neither side Read by a model
Plaintiffs may consolidate and refile supplemental exhibits to their Motion for Summary Judgment, subject to the requirements at Section III of this Order, by May 21, 2025.
The delay claim Not decided here Read by a model
Plaintiffs’ MSJ remains stayed pending resolution of Defendants’ MTD.
The other claims Not decided here Read by a model
The MTD is ripe for disposition. If any claims survive, this matter will likely proceed to summary judgment.
Months pending Not stated Read by a model
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model
Nationality Turkmenistan Read by a model
Plaintiffs are nationals of Turkmenistan who applied for asylum in the United States.

How the case ended

Docket
No. 2:23-cv-01977
Filed
December 21, 2023
Ended
September 30, 2025
Suit's filing to its end
649 days
How it ended
Dismissed on jurisdiction or the merits
From the record
idb disp 17 (judgment: other), judgment for defendant

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.

Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 14, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.