Mandamus decisions / Middle District of Florida

Taveras-Damasceno v. Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

Middle District of FloridaThomas P. BarberDecided January 30, 2026No. 8:26-cv-00094

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,996 written decisions from 2,731 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided November 12, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026 at 1:17 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,617 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,406 (87%), 1,039 of them in this group, measured November 14, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency USCIS Read by a model
The pace of adjudication of an immigration petition such as a parole in place petition is “statutorily committed to the discretion of the Secretary [of Homeland Security], and by extension, [United States Citizenship and Immigration Services].”
Form or filing I-130 (relative petition) Read by a model
the adjudication of a form I-130 parole in place application
What the suit asked for Decide the application Read by a model
seeks to compel final agency action that she alleges has been unlawfully withheld and unreasonably delayed with respect to the adjudication of a form I-130 parole in place application
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
Motion decided None Read by a model
Whose motion The court on its own Read by a model
This matter is before the Court sua sponte.
Disposition Dismissed The case or every delay claim was dismissed for a reason other than mootness. Read by a model
This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
Prevailing party Government Read by a model
This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
The delay claim Dismissed Read by a model
This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
Months pending Not stated Read by a model
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model
I-130 category Immediate relative Read by a model
a United States citizen – seeks to compel final agency action that she alleges has been unlawfully withheld and unreasonably delayed with respect to the adjudication of a form I-130 parole in place application submitted in the name of her spouse

How the case ended

Docket
No. 8:26-cv-00094
On the docket
This ruling (ECF 10)
Filed
January 13, 2026
Ended
January 30, 2026
Suit's filing to its end
17 days
How it ended
Dismissed on jurisdiction or the merits
From the record
order 2026-01-30 dismisses for want of jurisdiction; idb disp 14 (dismissed: other)

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.

The ruling's entry is the docket's one order or judgment entered the day of the decision. Both come from CourtListener's copy of the docket; check them there.

Supreme Court and Eleventh Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 14, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.