Mandamus decisions / District of Columbia

Morrison v. Mayorkas

District of ColumbiaTrevor N. McFaddenDecided September 16, 2025No. 1:24-cv-01765

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency CBP Read by a model
In August 2024, CBP approved his re-application.
Form or filing None named Read by a model
What the suit asked for Some other action Read by a model
compelling Defendants and those acting under them to perform their duty to complete all steps necessary to reinstate Plaintiff’s Global Entry membership.
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
The Secretary’s motion to dismiss for lack of subjectmatter jurisdiction will be granted.
Motion decided Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Read by a model
The Secretary’s motion to dismiss for lack of subjectmatter jurisdiction will be granted.
Whose motion The government's motion Read by a model
The Secretary’s motion to dismiss for lack of subjectmatter jurisdiction will be granted.
Disposition Dismissed as moot Dismissed or denied as moot because the agency acted. Read by a model
In sum, the Secretary has shown that this case is moot. Morrison has not shouldered his burden to show that an exception applies. So the Court must dismiss the case for lack of subjectmatter jurisdiction.
Prevailing party Neither side Read by a model
In sum, the Secretary has shown that this case is moot.
The other claims Moot: the agency acted Read by a model
In sum, the Secretary has shown that this case is moot. Morrison has not shouldered his burden to show that an exception applies. So the Court must dismiss the case for lack of subjectmatter jurisdiction.
Months pending 4.1 months from the application to the suit; 6 months from the application to the agency's action Read by a model
In August 2024, CBP approved his re-application.
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings Held moot Read by a model
Thus, an event has “transpired” since Morrison filed his Complaint that mooted the relief he requested.

How the case ended

Docket
No. 1:24-cv-01765
Filed
June 18, 2024
Ended
September 17, 2025
Suit's filing to its end
456 days
How it ended
Ended once the agency acted
From the record
idb disp 3 (dismissed: lack of jurisdiction)

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.

Supreme Court and D.C. Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.