Mandamus decisions / District of Rhode Island

Jelani v. FBI

District of Rhode IslandJohn J. McConnell, Jr.Decided August 1, 2025No. 1:24-cv-00532

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency USCIS Read by a model
With respect to DHS, Plaintiffs state that “the DHS oversees the [USCIS], the sub-agency in charge of adjudicating affirmative asylum applications, such as Mr. Jelani.”
Form or filing I-589 (asylum) Read by a model
Plaintiffs filed an affirmative I-589 Application for Asylum and Withholding of Removal on November 22, 2021.
What the suit asked for Decide the asylum application Read by a model
the Defendants process Plaintiffs’ security checks and adjudicate Plaintiffs’ asylum application
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.
Motion decided Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction; Other motion to dismiss Read by a model
Defendants also seek to dismiss the FBI as a party to the suit, asserting that Plaintiffs lack standing to bring claims against the FBI under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1).
Whose motion The government's motion Read by a model
In response, Defendants move to dismiss this action under the doctrine of collateral estoppel, stating that Plaintiffs’ claims were previously litigated in Ahmed.
Disposition Denied in the applicant's favor The principal motion was denied in full: a motion to dismiss denied so the case goes on, or relief denied on the merits. Read by a model
Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.
Prevailing party Applicant Read by a model
Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.
The delay claim The delay claim goes on Read by a model
Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.
Months pending 44.3 months from the application to the court's decision Read by a model
Plaintiffs filed an affirmative I-589 Application for Asylum and Withholding of Removal on November 22, 2021.
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model
Nationality Afghanistan Read by a model
Plaintiffs Mohammad Jelani and Aisha Yousofzai (“Plaintiffs”) are natives and citizens of Afghanistan who reside in Rhode Island.

How the case ended

Docket
No. 1:24-cv-00532
Filed
December 19, 2024
Ended
September 29, 2025
Suit's filing to its end
284 days
How it ended
Ended once the agency acted
From the record
idb disp 12 (dismissed: voluntarily)

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.

Supreme Court and First Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.