Passim

Mandamus decisions / Southern District of Ohio

Hamad v. Secretary, Department of Homeland Security

Southern District of OhioMichael J. NewmanDecided July 14, 2021

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,996 written decisions from 2,731 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided November 12, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026 at 1:17 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,617 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,406 (87%), 1,039 of them in this group, measured November 14, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency USCIS Read by a model
USCIS denied Ahmad’s Form I-765 because he no longer had a pending Form I-485 and thus was ineligible for employment authorization.
Form or filing I-765 (EAD) Read by a model
Ahmad filed a Form I-765 several months after appealing USCIS’s Form I-130 decision.
What the suit asked for Issue a work permit Read by a model
They first petition for a writ of mandamus requiring USCIS to approve Ahmad’s Form I-765 during the pendency of the Form I-130 appeal
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
For that reason, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion to dismiss Count I of Plaintiffs’ complaint.
Motion decided Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction; Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim Read by a model
Defendants now move to dismiss the complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and (6).
Whose motion The government's motion Read by a model
This case is before the Court on Defendants’ motion to dismiss.
Disposition Dismissed in part; some claims go on The government's motion to dismiss was granted in part: some claims were dismissed and others go on. Read by a model
Prevailing party Each side in part Read by a model
The other claims Some dismissed, some go on Read by a model
(1) GRANTS Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 12) Plaintiffs’ Count I; (2) DENIES Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Count II;
Months pending Not stated Read by a model
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model

Other orders in this case

The group holds 2 decisions from this suit, oldest first. Outcome counts on these pages count the case once, by its latest decision. How decisions are grouped into cases.

DecisionDecidedJudgeDisposition
Hamad v. Secretary, Department of Homeland SecurityThis decision July 14, 2021 Michael J. Newman Dismissed in part; some claims go on
Hamad v. Secretary, Department of Homeland SecurityThe case's latest decision: its outcome is the one counted October 27, 2021 Michael J. Newman Dismissed in part; some claims go on

How the case ended

This decision is not linked to a docket in the docket record yet, so how the case ended is not shown.

Supreme Court and Sixth Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 14, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.