Mandamus decisions / District of Columbia

Bouguettaya v. Chertoff

District of ColumbiaRichard J. LeonDecided February 5, 2007No. 1:06-cv-00482

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency USCIS Read by a model
On September 29, 2006, USCIS finally issued Dr. Bouguettaya a written denial of his application.
Form or filing I-485 (adjustment of status) Read by a model
Employment-Based Adjustment of Status (AOS) Application
What the suit asked for Decide the application Read by a model
to adjudicate his Employment-Based Adjustment of Status (AOS) Application
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
ORDERED that [# 23] Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.
Motion decided Other motion to dismiss Read by a model
Currently pending is the defendants' motion to dismiss.
Whose motion The government's motion Read by a model
Currently pending is the defendants' motion to dismiss.
Disposition Dismissed as moot Dismissed or denied as moot because the agency acted. Read by a model
As USCIS denied Dr. Bouguettaya's AOS application on September 29, 2006, his request that the Court order the USCIS to process that application is now moot.
Prevailing party Neither side Read by a model
As USCIS denied Dr. Bouguettaya's AOS application on September 29, 2006, his request that the Court order the USCIS to process that application is now moot.
The delay claim Moot: the agency acted Read by a model
As USCIS denied Dr. Bouguettaya's AOS application on September 29, 2006, his request that the Court order the USCIS to process that application is now moot.
Months pending 50.9 months from the application to the suit; 57.4 months from the application to the agency's action Read by a model
On September 29, 2006, USCIS finally issued Dr. Bouguettaya a written denial of his application.
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings Held moot Read by a model
As USCIS denied Dr. Bouguettaya's AOS application on September 29, 2006, his request that the Court order the USCIS to process that application is now moot.
Nationality Australia Read by a model
The Bouguettayas are citizens of Australia currently living in Virginia.

How the case ended

Docket
No. 1:06-cv-00482
Filed
March 15, 2006
Ended
February 1, 2007
Suit's filing to its end
323 days
How it ended
Ended once the agency acted
From the record
idb disp 14 (dismissed: other)

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why.

Supreme Court and D.C. Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.