Passim

Mandamus decisions / Western District of Oklahoma

Wanjiku v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

Western District of OklahomaDavid L. RussellDecided November 27, 2024

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,917 written decisions from 2,664 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 7:07 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency ICE Read by a model
Respondents United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, ICE Agent Curtis Fair, and ICE Agent Marion Kinnison to lift the detainer issued on May 8, 2023, and to refrain from issuing future detainers.
Form or filing None named Read by a model
What the suit asked for Some other action Read by a model
to lift the detainer issued on May 8, 2023, and to refrain from issuing future detainers.
Kind of order A stipulated or agreed order Read by a model
The Court interprets this filing as a voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Motion decided None Read by a model
Whose motion The plaintiff's motion Read by a model
Instead, Petitioner filed a “Motion to Withdraw Petition” [Doc. No. 32], which requests to withdraw his Writ because he was never served with a copy of the detainer.
Disposition Stipulated or agreed order An order the parties asked for together, or the plaintiff's own dismissal. Not counted as either side's win. Read by a model
The Court interprets this filing as a voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Prevailing party Neither side Read by a model
The Court interprets this filing as a voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The other claims Dismissed Read by a model
Petitioner’s Writ is DISMISSED.
Months pending Not stated Read by a model
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model

Other orders in this case

The group holds 2 decisions from this suit, oldest first. Outcome counts on these pages count the case once, by its latest decision, this one. How decisions are grouped into cases.

DecisionDecidedJudgeDisposition
Wanjiku v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement October 29, 2024 David L. Russell Magistrate judge's recommendation
Wanjiku v. Immigration and Customs EnforcementThis decisionThe case's latest decision: its outcome is the one counted November 27, 2024 David L. Russell Stipulated or agreed order

How the case ended

This decision is not linked to a docket in the docket record yet, so how the case ended is not shown.

Supreme Court and Tenth Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.