Passim

Mandamus decisions / District of Columbia

Tahavori v. Blinken

District of ColumbiaJohn D. BatesDecided March 28, 2024No. 1:23-cv-01460

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency Department of State Read by a model
Plaintiffs generally allege that State’s delay in rendering a final decision on their visa applications is unreasonable, and they assert claims under the Mandamus Act and the APA.
Form or filing 221(g) (consular refusal); DS-260 (immigrant visa) Read by a model
On December 16, 2021, plaintiffs submitted a DS-260 Immigrant Visa and Alien Registration Application along with the requisite fees and supporting documentation.
What the suit asked for Finish 221(g) processing Read by a model
After the interview, the consular officer gave Ahmadzadeh and Taham a “temporary refusal letter” and informed them that their application would need to go through further administrative processing.
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
it is further ORDERED that [6] defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that plaintiff’s case is DISMISSED.
Motion decided Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction; Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim Read by a model
State moved to dismiss the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6).
Whose motion Cross-motions Read by a model
Before the Court are plaintiffs’ motion to compel production of the administrative record and State’s motion to dismiss.
Disposition Dismissed The case or every delay claim was dismissed for a reason other than mootness. Read by a model
ORDERED that [6] defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that plaintiff’s case is DISMISSED.
Prevailing party Government Read by a model
Accordingly, the Court will grant State’s motion to dismiss on this basis.
The delay claim Dismissed Read by a model
Considering these factors together, the Court concludes that plaintiffs’ complaint fails to plausibly state an unreasonable delay claim.
Months pending 27.4 months from the application to the court's decision Read by a model
On December 16, 2021, plaintiffs submitted a DS-260 Immigrant Visa and Alien Registration Application along with the requisite fees and supporting documentation.
TRAC factors The court weighed the TRAC factors
  • 1. Rule of reasonfavors the government
  • 2. Congressional timetablefavors the applicant
  • 3. Human health and welfarefavors the applicant
  • 4. Competing prioritiesfavors the government
  • 5. Interests prejudicedfavors the applicant
  • 6. No impropriety neededfavors the government
Read by a model
The first and fourth TRAC factors are generally understood to be the most important, and both weigh strongly in State’s favor.
The government's delay arguments Line-jumping accepted Read by a model
“The most important factors—those regarding the length of the delay and concerns about line-jumping—weigh in favor of granting [State’s] motion,”
Threshold rulings Consular nonreviewability rejected Read by a model
The Court incorporates its prior discussion here and finds State’s consular nonreviewability arguments unpersuasive.
Nationality Iran Read by a model
Her parents, Saeid Ahmadzadeh and Akram Taham, are Iranian nationals.
I-130 category Immediate relative Read by a model
Tahavori seeks to obtain U.S. immigration visas for her parents pursuant to the provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq., that provide for visa issuance to the immediate relatives of U.S. citizens.

How the case ended

Docket
No. 1:23-cv-01460
Filed
May 22, 2023
Ended
March 28, 2024
Suit's filing to its end
311 days
How it ended
Dismissed on jurisdiction or the merits
From the record
idb disp 6 (judgment: motion before trial), judgment for defendant

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.

Supreme Court and D.C. Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.