Passim

Mandamus decisions / Eastern District of California

Mohamed v. Pompeo

Eastern District of CaliforniaDecided January 19, 2022

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,996 written decisions from 2,731 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided November 12, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026 at 1:17 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,617 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,406 (87%), 1,039 of them in this group, measured November 14, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency Department of State Read by a model
In so holding, the court 8 mandated the Department of State defendants to issue a decision on the visa applications before 9 the end of the fiscal year: September 30, 2019.
Form or filing DS-260 (immigrant visa) Read by a model
DS-260 preparation
What the suit asked for Decide the application Read by a model
In so holding, the court 8 mandated the Department of State defendants to issue a decision on the visa applications before 9 the end of the fiscal year: September 30, 2019.
Kind of order An order on fees Read by a model
Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees (Doc. 41) is granted in part, in the 21 amount of $25,952.18.
Motion decided Fees under EAJA Read by a model
Before the court is plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to the Equal 18 Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A), in the amount of $68,259.49.
Whose motion The plaintiff's motion Read by a model
plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees and costs
Disposition Attorney's fees An order on attorney's fees or costs after the case, counted for the side that won the fee motion. Read by a model
Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees (Doc. 41) is granted in part, in the 21 amount of $25,952.18.
Prevailing party Each side in part Read by a model
Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees (Doc. 41) is granted in part, in the 21 amount of $25,952.18.
The delay claim Not decided here Read by a model
Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees (Doc. 41) is granted in part, in the 21 amount of $25,952.18.
Months pending Not stated Read by a model
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model

Other orders in this case

The group holds 3 decisions from this suit, oldest first. Outcome counts on these pages count the case once, by its latest decision, this one. How decisions are grouped into cases.

DecisionDecidedJudgeDisposition
Mohamed v. Pompeo September 27, 2019 Lawrence J. O'Neill Granted in the applicant's favor
Mohamed v. Pompeo July 13, 2020 Stipulated or agreed order
Mohamed v. PompeoThis decisionThe case's latest decision: its outcome is the one counted January 19, 2022 Attorney's fees

How the case ended

This decision is not linked to a docket in the docket record yet, so how the case ended is not shown.

Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 14, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.