Mandamus decisions / Eastern District of California

Motaghedi v. Blinken

Eastern District of CaliforniaDale A. DrozdDecided March 30, 2021No. 1:19-cv-01466

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency Department of State Read by a model
However, on January 20, 2021, President Joseph Biden revoked PP 9645 and directed the 10 Department of State to resume visa processing in a manner consistent with revocation of PP 9645.
Form or filing DS-160 (nonimmigrant visa); DS-260 (immigrant visa) Read by a model
family-based or fiancé-based visas.
What the suit asked for Some other action Read by a model
Plaintiffs filed a complaint alleging that defendants unlawfully 4 withheld adjudications of case-by-case waivers of PP 9545.
Kind of order A procedural order Read by a model
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS 13 MOOT
Motion decided Other motion to dismiss Read by a model
The pending motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 67) is denied as moot;
Whose motion The government's motion Read by a model
the United States filed a motion to dismiss raising the fact that ten of
Disposition Procedural order A scheduling, briefing, stay, show-cause or other procedural order. Not counted as either side's win. Read by a model
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS 13 MOOT
Prevailing party Neither side Read by a model
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS 13 MOOT
The delay claim Not decided here Read by a model
why the operative complaint should not be dismissed as moot.
The other claims Not decided here Read by a model
why the operative complaint should not be dismissed as moot.
Months pending Not stated Read by a model
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model
Nationality Iran Read by a model
their Iranian national relatives or fiancées applying for visas.
212(f) proclamation Proclamation 9645 Read by a model
Their visas were (at least initially) refused pursuant to Presidential Proclamation 9645,

Other orders in this case

The group holds 3 decisions from this suit, oldest first. Outcome counts on these pages count the case once, by its latest decision, this one. How decisions are grouped into cases.

DecisionDecidedJudgeDisposition
Motaghedi v. Blinken January 14, 2020 Dale A. Drozd Denied in the government's favor
Motaghedi v. Blinken January 30, 2020 Dale A. Drozd Dismissed in part; some claims go on
Motaghedi v. BlinkenThis decisionThe case's latest decision: its outcome is the one counted March 30, 2021 Dale A. Drozd Procedural order

How the case ended

Docket
No. 1:19-cv-01466
Filed
October 15, 2019
Ended
April 22, 2021
Suit's filing to its end
555 days
How it ended
Ended once the agency acted
From the record
idb disp 12 (dismissed: voluntarily)

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.

Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.