Mandamus decisions / District of Connecticut
Bell v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service
Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener
2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.
These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.
What the decision decided
Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.
| Agency |
ICE
Read by a model
Shortly after Bell began serving his sentence, the INS filed a detainer *372 with state prison officials based on Bell's felony conviction. |
|---|---|
| Form or filing | None named Read by a model |
| What the suit asked for | Not recorded Read by a model |
| Kind of order |
A ruling on a motion or the petition
Read by a model
RULING ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS |
| Motion decided | None Read by a model |
| Whose motion |
The plaintiff's motion
Read by a model
Bell filed this petition for a writ of mandamus on December 12, 2002, seeking a release from state custody, an immediate hearing before an immigration judge and the dismissal of the INS detainer. |
| Disposition |
Denied in the government's favor
The principal motion was denied in full: a motion to dismiss denied so the case goes on, or relief denied on the merits.
Read by a model
For the foregoing reasons, Bell's petition (doc. # 1) is denied. |
| Prevailing party |
Government
Read by a model
Because the petitioner has no right to an immediate hearing, release from state custody or dismissal of the detainer, the petitioner's petition for a writ of mandamus is denied. |
| The delay claim |
Relief denied
Read by a model
Because the petitioner has no right to an immediate hearing, release from state custody or dismissal of the detainer, the petitioner's petition for a writ of mandamus is denied. |
| The other claims |
Dismissed
Read by a model
Therefore, Bell's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. |
| Months pending | Not stated Read by a model |
| TRAC factors | The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model |
| Threshold rulings | None Read by a model |
| Nationality |
Jamaica
Read by a model
Bell is a native and citizen of Jamaica, who entered this country illegally in or about July 1998. |
How the case ended
This decision is not linked to a docket in the docket record yet, so how the case ended is not shown.
Supreme Court and Second Circuit authority
District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.
-
Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, 542 U.S. 55
Supreme Court, June 14, 2004. Section 706(1) and mandamus reach only a discrete agency action that the agency is legally required to take, so a court cannot compel programmatic improvements or action the law leaves to agency discretion.
ImmCite: treatment available, history exists, not clearance