Passim

Mandamus decisions / District of South Carolina

Nelson v. United States

District of South CarolinaCameron McGowan CurrieDecided October 4, 2023

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,996 written decisions from 2,731 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided November 12, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026 at 1:17 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,617 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,406 (87%), 1,039 of them in this group, measured November 14, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency Department of Justice Read by a model
This matter is before the court on Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus, in which he requests the court order the Attorney General of the United States implement removal proceedings against him under the First Step Act.
Form or filing None named Read by a model
What the suit asked for Some other action Read by a model
This matter is before the court on Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus, in which he requests the court order the Attorney General of the United States implement removal proceedings against him under the First Step Act.
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
This action is hereby dismissed without prejudice.
Motion decided None Read by a model
Whose motion The plaintiff's motion Read by a model
This matter is before the court on Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disposition Dismissed The case or every delay claim was dismissed for a reason other than mootness. Read by a model
This action is hereby dismissed without prejudice.
Prevailing party Government Read by a model
This action is hereby dismissed without prejudice.
The delay claim Dismissed Read by a model
the statute does not create an affirmative duty sufficient to bring a writ of mandamus, as Petitioner suggests. Petitioner’s objection is therefore overruled
Months pending Not stated Read by a model
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model

How the case ended

This decision is not linked to a docket in the docket record yet, so how the case ended is not shown.

Supreme Court and Fourth Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 14, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.