Mandamus decisions / District of Rhode Island

Abreu v. United States

District of Rhode IslandPettineDecided June 4, 1992

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,996 written decisions from 2,731 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided November 12, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026 at 1:17 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,617 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,406 (87%), 1,039 of them in this group, measured November 14, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency Not recorded Read by a model
Form or filing None named Read by a model
What the suit asked for Some other action Read by a model
If, as alleged, it is INS policy to stall these proceedings until after the date of release, the Court has no qualms interpreting these motions as mandamus requests for deportation hearings.
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
The Court issues a writ of mandamus ordering the INS to conduct deportation hearings as soon as possible for these plaintiffs and not to wait for their release.
Motion decided None Read by a model
Whose motion The plaintiff's motion Read by a model
All three plaintiff-inmates filed their motions pro se. Fernandez and Bello-Rodriguez labeled theirs as Motions to Issue Mandamus; Abreu wrote a letter to the INS and the Court requesting a prompt deportation hearing.
Disposition Granted in the applicant's favor The principal motion was granted in full: summary judgment for either side, an injunction or TRO, a writ or order to act, fees. A motion to dismiss granted in full counts as Dismissed; a transfer is listed apart. Read by a model
The Court issues a writ of mandamus ordering the INS to conduct deportation hearings as soon as possible for these plaintiffs and not to wait for their release.
Prevailing party Applicant Read by a model
The Court issues a writ of mandamus ordering the INS to conduct deportation hearings as soon as possible for these plaintiffs and not to wait for their release.
The delay claim Relief ordered Read by a model
The Court issues a writ of mandamus ordering the INS to conduct deportation hearings as soon as possible for these plaintiffs and not to wait for their release.
Months pending Not stated Read by a model
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model
Nationality Dominican Republic Read by a model
Mr. Ramon Abreu is a citizen of the Dominican Republic.

How the case ended

This decision is not linked to a docket in the docket record yet, so how the case ended is not shown.

Supreme Court and First Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 14, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.