Passim

Mandamus decisions / Middle District of Florida

Feng v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services

Middle District of FloridaCarlos E. MendozaDecided May 15, 2024No. 6:23-cv-01910

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,996 written decisions from 2,731 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided November 12, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026 at 1:17 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,617 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,406 (87%), 1,039 of them in this group, measured November 14, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency USCIS Read by a model
On February 29, 2024, Plaintiff’s I-485 application was approved by United States Citizenship and Immigration Services.
Form or filing I-485 (adjustment of status) Read by a model
the alleged unreasonable delay in the adjudication of her I-485 application.
What the suit asked for Decide the application Read by a model
Plaintiff filed this action seeking relief under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq., for the alleged unreasonable delay in the adjudication of her I-485 application.
Kind of order A stipulated or agreed order Read by a model
The Government now moves to dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint as moot, which Plaintiff has indicated she does not oppose.
Motion decided Other motion to dismiss Read by a model
The Government’s Unopposed Renewed Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 13) is GRANTED.
Whose motion The government's motion Read by a model
Government’s Unopposed Renewed Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 13)
Disposition Stipulated or agreed order An order the parties asked for together, or the plaintiff's own dismissal. Not counted as either side's win. Read by a model
The Government now moves to dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint as moot, which Plaintiff has indicated she does not oppose.
Prevailing party Neither side Read by a model
The Government now moves to dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint as moot, which Plaintiff has indicated she does not oppose.
The delay claim Moot: the agency acted Read by a model
The approval of Plaintiffs I-485 application has rendered moot Plaintiff's Complaint and it is due to be dismissed.
Months pending Not stated at filing The agency acted before this decision, so the months up to the decision are not a delay and are not shown. Read by a model
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings Held moot Read by a model
The approval of Plaintiffs I-485 application has rendered moot Plaintiff's Complaint and it is due to be dismissed.

How the case ended

Docket
No. 6:23-cv-01910
On the docket
This ruling (ECF 14), deciding the motion (ECF 13)
Filed
October 3, 2023
Ended
May 15, 2024
Suit's filing to its end
225 days
How it ended
Ended once the agency acted
From the record
idb disp 6 (judgment: motion before trial), judgment for defendant

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.

The ruling's entry is the docket's one order or judgment entered the day of the decision, and the motion number is read from that entry's text. Both come from CourtListener's copy of the docket; check them there.

Supreme Court and Eleventh Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 14, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.