Mandamus decisions / District of Columbia

Nine Iraqi Allies Under Serious Threat Because of Their Faithful Service to the United States v. Kerry

District of ColumbiaGladys KesslerDecided March 7, 2016No. 1:15-cv-00300

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,996 written decisions from 2,731 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided November 12, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026 at 1:17 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,617 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,406 (87%), 1,039 of them in this group, measured November 14, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency Department of State Read by a model
Lacking COM Approval, a prerequisite for the second stage of the SIV -17application process, Kilo does not have a complete SIV application pending before the State Department.
Form or filing 221(g) (consular refusal); DS-260 (immigrant visa) Read by a model
Your client's case remains pending additional administrative processing, which must be completed before a final determination can be made on his Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) application.
What the suit asked for Finish 221(g) processing Read by a model
Counts 3 through 6 of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint seek an order directing the Government to adjudicate Plaintiffs' SIV applications, which, according to Plaintiffs, are awaiting final action.
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
the Government's Motion to Dismiss shall be granted with respect to Counts 1 & 2 and denied with respect to Counts 3-6 (except insofar as those claims relate to Alpha, Bravo, and Delta).
Motion decided Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction; Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim Read by a model
On September 1, 2015, the Government filed its Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Failure to State a Claim ("Gov't's Mot.") [Dkt. No. 36].
Whose motion The government's motion Read by a model
On September 1, 2015, the Government filed its Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Failure to State a Claim
Disposition Dismissed in part; some claims go on The government's motion to dismiss was granted in part: some claims were dismissed and others go on. Read by a model
the Government's Motion to Dismiss shall be granted with respect to Counts 1 & 2 and denied with respect to Counts 3-6 (except insofar as those claims relate to Alpha, Bravo, and Delta).
Prevailing party Each side in part Read by a model
the Government's Motion to Dismiss shall be granted with respect to Counts 1 & 2 and denied with respect to Counts 3-6 (except insofar as those claims relate to Alpha, Bravo, and Delta).
The delay claim The delay claim goes on Read by a model
the Government's Motion to Dismiss shall be granted with respect to Counts 1 & 2 and denied with respect to Counts 3-6 (except insofar as those claims relate to Alpha, Bravo, and Delta).
The other claims Dismissed Read by a model
Counts 1 and 2 of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint must be dismissed.
Months pending Not stated at filing The agency acted before this decision, so the months up to the decision are not a delay and are not shown. Read by a model
Ronaldo is an Iraqi citizen who applied for COM Approval on October 2, 2009, and completed his visa interview on October 13, 2010.
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings Consular nonreviewability rejected; Held moot; Mootness argument rejected; Duty to re-adjudicate a 221(g) refusal found Read by a model
Ronaldo, Foxtrot, India, Juliet, Alice, Hotel, and Lima's SIV applications have not been finally refused and instead, remain in "administrative processing," see infra section III. B. 2. a.
Nationality Iraq Read by a model
Ronaldo is an Iraqi citizen

Other orders in this case

The group holds 2 decisions from this suit, oldest first. Outcome counts on these pages count the case once, by its latest decision, this one. How decisions are grouped into cases.

DecisionDecidedJudgeDisposition
Nine Iraqi Allies Under Serious Threat Because of Their Faithful Service to the United States v. Kerry January 28, 2016 Dismissed in part; some claims go on
Nine Iraqi Allies Under Serious Threat Because of Their Faithful Service to the United States v. KerryThis decisionThe case's latest decision: its outcome is the one counted March 7, 2016 Gladys Kessler Dismissed in part; some claims go on

How the case ended

Docket
No. 1:15-cv-00300
Filed
February 27, 2015
Ended
August 10, 2016
Suit's filing to its end
530 days
How it ended
Ended once the agency acted
From the record
idb disp 12 (dismissed: voluntarily)

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.

Supreme Court and D.C. Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 14, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.