Mandamus decisions / District of Connecticut
Keane v. Velarde
Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener
2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.
These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.
What the decision decided
Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.
| Agency |
USCIS
Read by a model
Barbara Q. Velarde, Chief of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) Office of Administrative Appeals |
|---|---|
| Form or filing |
N-600A
Read by a model
On Form N-600A, Tara Keane |
| What the suit asked for |
Some other action
Read by a model
Specifically, Plaintiffs seek to compel Defendants to issue Certificates of Citizenship to Daniel and Jason Daskalakis under the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”). |
| Kind of order |
A ruling on a motion or the petition
Read by a model
For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss Plaintiff Helene Keane for lack of standing. |
| Motion decided |
Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction; Other motion to dismiss; Transfer
Read by a model
For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss Plaintiff Helene Keane for lack of standing. The Court DENIES the motion to dismiss for improper venue and instead GRANTS the motion to transfer the case to the Southern District of New York. |
| Whose motion |
The government's motion
Read by a model
Defendants have moved to dismiss Helene Keane from the suit for lack of standing. |
| Disposition |
Granted in the government's favor
The principal motion was granted in full: summary judgment for either side, an injunction or TRO, a writ or order to act, fees. A motion to dismiss granted in full counts as Dismissed; a transfer is listed apart.
Read by a model
The Court DENIES the motion to dismiss for improper venue and instead GRANTS the motion to transfer the case to the Southern District of New York. |
| Prevailing party |
Government
Read by a model
The Court DENIES the motion to dismiss for improper venue and instead GRANTS the motion to transfer the case to the Southern District of New York. |
| The delay claim |
The delay claim goes on
Read by a model
The Court therefore retains jurisdiction over the remaining Plaintiffs. |
| The other claims |
The delay claim goes on
Read by a model
The Court therefore retains jurisdiction over the remaining Plaintiffs. |
| Months pending |
262.9 months from the application to the suit; 277 months from the application to the court's decision
Read by a model
On August 17, 1998, Tara Keane submitted two applications for naturalization on behalf of her children. |
| TRAC factors | The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model |
| Threshold rulings | None Read by a model |
How the case ended
- Docket
- No. 3:20-cv-00977
- Filed
- July 14, 2020
- Ended
- September 17, 2021
- Suit's filing to its end
- 430 days
- How it ended
- Transferred
- From the record
- idb disp 0 (transferred to another district)
A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.
Supreme Court and Second Circuit authority
District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.
-
Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, 542 U.S. 55
Supreme Court, June 14, 2004. Section 706(1) and mandamus reach only a discrete agency action that the agency is legally required to take, so a court cannot compel programmatic improvements or action the law leaves to agency discretion.
ImmCite: treatment available, history exists, not clearance