Passim

Mandamus decisions / Southern District of California

Khalid Aldurra v. United States Department of State

Southern District of CaliforniaDana M. SabrawDecided January 8, 2026No. 3:25-cv-01322

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,996 written decisions from 2,731 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided November 12, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026 at 1:17 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,617 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,406 (87%), 1,039 of them in this group, measured November 14, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency Department of State Read by a model
Following the interview, the consular officer requested additional information, which Ms. Al-Qayisi submitted on September 26, 2023.
Form or filing 221(g) (consular refusal); DS-260 (immigrant visa) Read by a model
Specifically, Plaintiff alleges Defendants’ delay in adjudicating Plaintiff’s visa application has been unreasonable.
What the suit asked for Finish 221(g) processing Read by a model
On May 23, 2025, Plaintiff filed the present case seeking a writ of mandamus compelling Defendants to adjudicate the petition.
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
For the reasons set out above, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part.
Motion decided Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim Read by a model
Defendants move to dismiss Plaintiff’s APA and due process claims for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).
Whose motion The government's motion Read by a model
This case comes before the Court on Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint.
Disposition Dismissed in part; some claims go on The government's motion to dismiss was granted in part: some claims were dismissed and others go on. Read by a model
Accordingly, Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s APA claim is denied.
Prevailing party Each side in part Read by a model
Accordingly, Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s APA claim is denied.
The delay claim The delay claim goes on Read by a model
Accordingly, Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s APA claim is denied.
The other claims Dismissed Read by a model
Specifically, the Court denies the motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s APA claim, but grants the motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s due process claim.
Months pending 19.9 months from the application to the suit; 27.5 months from the application to the court's decision Read by a model
Ms. Al-Qayisi’s interview took place on September 24, 2023.
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings Duty to re-adjudicate a 221(g) refusal found Read by a model
The Court also rejects Defendants’ second argument, which relies on Karimova v. Abate, No. 23-5178, 2024 WL 3517852 (D.C. Cir. July 24, 2024).
Nationality Iraq Read by a model
his mother Lubna Mohammed Abdo Al-Qayisi who is a citizen of Iraq living in Jordan.
I-130 category Immediate relative Read by a model
is a United States citizen who resides in San Diego, California. (Compl. at 3, ECF No. 1.) On August 14, 2021, Plaintiff filed a visa petition with United States Customs and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) for his mother

Other orders in this case

The group holds 2 decisions from this suit, oldest first. Outcome counts on these pages count the case once, by its latest decision. How decisions are grouped into cases.

DecisionDecidedJudgeDisposition
Khalid Aldurra v. United States Department of StateThis decision January 8, 2026 Dana M. Sabraw Dismissed in part; some claims go on
Khalid Aldurra v. United States Department of StateThe case's latest decision: its outcome is the one counted May 20, 2026 Dana M. Sabraw Dismissed in part; some claims go on

How the case ended

Docket
No. 3:25-cv-01322
On the docket
This ruling (ECF 10)
Filed
May 23, 2025
Status
Pending as of the last docket check

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.

The ruling's entry is the docket's one order or judgment entered the day of the decision. Both come from CourtListener's copy of the docket; check them there.

Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 14, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.