Passim

Mandamus decisions / District of Columbia

Fallahi v. Bell

District of ColumbiaAmit P. MehtaDecided August 20, 2024No. 1:23-cv-03292

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency Department of State Read by a model
In June 2023, a consular officer at the U.S. Embassy in Switzerland interviewed Plaintiff and his family.
Form or filing 221(g) (consular refusal); DS-160 (nonimmigrant visa) Read by a model
Plaintiff Arya Fallahi seeks to compel Defendants, who are various federal officials, to adjudicate his nonimmigrant worker visa application, which has now been pending for 14 months since his consular officer interview.
What the suit asked for Finish 221(g) processing Read by a model
Plaintiff seeks an order from the court mandating adjudication of his application within 15 calendar days of the order’s entry.
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
For the foregoing reasons, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 6, is granted.
Motion decided Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction; Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim Read by a model
Defendants have moved to dismiss under Rules 12(b)(1) for lack of standing and (b)(6) for failure to state a claim.
Whose motion The government's motion Read by a model
Defendants move to dismiss the case for, among other grounds, failure to state a claim.
Disposition Dismissed The case or every delay claim was dismissed for a reason other than mootness. Read by a model
Defendants move to dismiss the case for, among other grounds, failure to state a claim. Defendants’ motion is granted.
Prevailing party Government Read by a model
For the foregoing reasons, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 6, is granted.
The delay claim Dismissed Read by a model
For the foregoing reasons, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 6, is granted.
Months pending 4.6 months from the application to the suit; 14.2 months from the application to the court's decision Read by a model
In June 2023, a consular officer at the U.S. Embassy in Switzerland interviewed Plaintiff and his family.
TRAC factors The court weighed the TRAC factors
  • 1. Rule of reasonneutral
  • 2. Congressional timetableneutral
  • 3. Human health and welfarefavors the government
  • 4. Competing prioritiesfavors the government
  • 5. Interests prejudicedfavors the government
  • 6. No impropriety neededneutral
Read by a model
Thus, the approximately 14month delay between June 2023, when Plaintiff appeared for his consular interview, and the date of this opinion is, at best, neutral.
The government's delay arguments Line-jumping accepted Read by a model
Granting Plaintiff the relief he seeks simply would move him “ahead of longer-pending petitions” with no overall gain in administrative processing.
Threshold rulings APA adequate-remedy bar applied (mandamus claim fails) Read by a model
The Mandamus Act claim fails because the APA provides an adequate remedy at law.
Nationality Iran Read by a model
Plaintiff is a citizen of Iran and Germany and currently resides in Switzerland.

How the case ended

Docket
No. 1:23-cv-03292
Filed
November 3, 2023
Ended
August 20, 2024
Suit's filing to its end
291 days
How it ended
Dismissed, ground not recorded
From the record
idb disp 14 (dismissed: other)

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why. Other suits in this court.

Supreme Court and D.C. Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.