Mandamus decisions / District of Columbia

National Capital Presbytery v. Nielsen

District of ColumbiaTimothy J. KellyDecided October 19, 2021

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,914 written decisions from 2,661 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided October 30, 2026. Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:24 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,606 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,371 (85%), measured November 3, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency USCIS Read by a model
In January 2018, the Director of the USCIS California Service Center denied NCP’s renewal petition.
Form or filing I-129 (worker petition); I-539 (change or extension of stay) Read by a model
In 2014, NCP filed an I-129 petition for an R-1 visa for Reverend Lal Engzau, an ordained Presbyterian minister and citizen of Myanmar.
What the suit asked for Not recorded Read by a model
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
For the reasons explained below, the Court will grant both motions in part and deny them in part and remand the matter to the agency for further proceedings.
Motion decided Summary judgment Read by a model
Before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment.
Whose motion Cross-motions Read by a model
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 19, will be granted in part and denied in part, and Plaintiffs’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 20, will be granted in part and denied in part.
Disposition Dismissed in part; some claims go on The government's motion to dismiss was granted in part: some claims were dismissed and others go on. Read by a model
Prevailing party Each side in part Read by a model
The other claims Some dismissed, some go on Read by a model
For the reasons explained below, the Court will grant both motions in part and deny them in part and remand the matter to the agency for further proceedings.
Months pending 16 months from the application to the suit; 6 months from the application to the agency's action Read by a model
In January 2018, the Director of the USCIS California Service Center denied NCP’s renewal petition.
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model
Nationality Myanmar Read by a model
In 2014, NCP filed an I-129 petition for an R-1 visa for Reverend Lal Engzau, an ordained Presbyterian minister and citizen of Myanmar.

How the case ended

This decision is not linked to a docket in the docket record yet, so how the case ended is not shown.

Supreme Court and D.C. Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 3, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.