Mandamus decisions / Southern District of New York

Saleh v. Ridge

Southern District of New YorkSwainDecided February 24, 2005

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,996 written decisions from 2,731 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided November 12, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026 at 1:17 a.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,617 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,406 (87%), 1,039 of them in this group, measured November 14, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency USCIS Read by a model
CIS has published a schedule setting forth the time periods during which it anticipates it will consider asylees' applications according to when such applications were filed.
Form or filing I-485 (adjustment of status) Read by a model
In or about August 1995, Plaintiff and his wife filed Applications for Adjustment of Status
What the suit asked for Decide the application Read by a model
Plaintiff claims that the delay in adjudication of his application for adjustment of immigration status is unreasonable and requests that this Court compel Defendants to act on his application.
Motion decided Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction; Summary judgment Read by a model
Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted, and Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied.
Disposition Dismissed The case or every delay claim was dismissed for a reason other than mootness. Read by a model
The Complaint is hereby dismissed without prejudice to a future claim of unreasonable delay in adjudicating Plaintiff's application for adjustment of status in the event the application remains unresolved after September 30, 2006.
Prevailing party Government Read by a model
Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted, and Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied.
Months pending 114.4 months from the application to the court's decision Read by a model
In or about August 1995, Plaintiff and his wife filed Applications for Adjustment of Status with the New York District Office of the Immigration and Naturalization Service ("INS")
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model

How the case ended

This decision is not linked to a docket in the docket record yet, so how the case ended is not shown.

Supreme Court and Second Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 14, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.