Mandamus decisions / Western District of Texas

San Millan v. Collins

Western District of TexasAndrew B. DavisDecided November 5, 2026No. 1:26-cv-02660

Read the decisionOriginal on CourtListener

2,948 written decisions from 2,691 cases in the whole mandamus and agency-delay group, the group's newest decided November 10, 2026. Updated November 11, 2026 at 1:21 p.m. CT; the Passim connector counts the live collection, which can differ by the day's additions and retirements (which total to quote). Coverage: of the 1,632 public decisions since January 1, 2025 that a CourtListener and GovInfo search for mandamus and agency delay finds, Passim holds 1,398 (86%), measured November 11, 2026. Some of what that search finds are not mandamus decisions. Tell us about a decision we're missing.

These are counts of past written decisions and dockets, not predictions of how any case will be decided. A distribution appears only when at least 5 decisions (or 5 dockets) are behind it; smaller groups are listed, not summarized. How it's counted.

What the decision decided

Each value cites the passage it was read from. Values read by a model were checked against that passage; values read by rule come from fixed text patterns. Read the decision before relying on either.

Agency USCIS Read by a model
Petitioner requests the Court enter an order requiring the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services to adjudicate his pending immigration applications within a certain time.
Form or filing I-485 (adjustment of status) Read by a model
Petitioner is currently detained at the T. Don Hutto Detention Center and is seeking adjustment of status.
What the suit asked for Not recorded Read by a model
Kind of order A ruling on a motion or the petition Read by a model
Because his detention is lawful, his petition is denied. Petitioner’s requests for mandamus and APA relief are also denied.
Motion decided None Read by a model
Whose motion The plaintiff's motion Read by a model
On September 23, 2026, Petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus contesting his detention and seeking immediate release or an individualized bond hearing. Petitioner also requested a writ of mandamus and relief under the APA.
Disposition Denied in the government's favor The principal motion was denied in full: a motion to dismiss denied so the case goes on, or relief denied on the merits. Read by a model
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.
Prevailing party Government Read by a model
Because his detention is lawful, his petition is denied. Petitioner’s requests for mandamus and APA relief are also denied.
The delay claim Dismissed Read by a model
This Court’s dismissal of these claims in this habeas petition is without prejudice to their continuation in the separate pending matter.
The other claims Relief denied Read by a model
Because his detention is lawful, his petition is denied.
Months pending Not stated Read by a model
TRAC factors The court did not weigh the TRAC factors Read by a model
Threshold rulings None Read by a model
Nationality Cuba Read by a model
Marlon Ruiz San Millan is a native and citizen of Cuba

How the case ended

Docket
No. 1:26-cv-02660
Filed
September 23, 2026
Ended
November 5, 2026
Suit's filing to its end
43 days
How it ended
Ended, outcome not recorded
From the record
terminated; no disposition recorded

A voluntary or stipulated dismissal is how most suits end once the agency acts; the docket rarely says why.

Supreme Court and Fifth Circuit authority

District decisions bind no one. On the questions this decision raises, the Supreme Court decisions and the circuit's published decisions listed here bind this court; a circuit disposition marked nonprecedential was not published as precedent and is persuasive only. ImmCite status as read November 11, 2026. Check the current status before relying on one.